2010
DOI: 10.1112/s0010437x10004847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimodules and branes in deformation quantization

Abstract: We prove a version of Kontsevich's formality theorem for two subspaces (branes) of a vector space X. The result implies, in particular, that the Kontsevich deformation quantizations of S(X * ) and ∧(X) associated with a quadratic Poisson structure are Koszul dual. This answers an open question in Shoikhet's recent paper on Koszul duality in deformation quantization.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
97
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(99 reference statements)
1
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The biquantization of symmetric pairs was studied in [7] in terms of Kontsevich-like graphs. This paper, also in view of recent results in [4], amends a minor mistake that did not spoil the main results of the paper. The mistake consisted in ignoring a regular term in the boundary contribution of some propagators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The biquantization of symmetric pairs was studied in [7] in terms of Kontsevich-like graphs. This paper, also in view of recent results in [4], amends a minor mistake that did not spoil the main results of the paper. The mistake consisted in ignoring a regular term in the boundary contribution of some propagators.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The whole construction of [7, Section 1.6] relies on the 4-colored propagators introduced in [5] for the Poisson sigma model with two branes. It was recently observed by G. Felder and the second author in the preparation of [4], that, unlike in Kontsevich [13], the boundary contributions of the 4-colored propagators on the first quadrant for the collapse of the two endpoints may have a regular term in addition to the usual singular one. The regular term turns out simply to be the differential of the angle of the position where the two points collapsed, measured with respect to the origin, up to a sign, which depends on the boundary conditions themselves (roughly speaking, if we consider the same boundary conditions on the two half-lines bounding the first quadrant, then the sign is positive, while, for different boundary conditions on the two half-lines, we have a negative sign).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We denote by C on K̵ h can be obtained from the ones for the corresponding A ∞ -structure on K̵ h constructed in [4,Section 7] by replacing ω +,− by its logarithmic counterpart (5): also for later computations, we frequently and implicitly refer to [4,Section 7].…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%