2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.phpro.2017.06.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimodal Imaging at ICON Using Neutrons and X-rays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is of clear interest to be able to quantify the similarity between two images. Equation (15) in [18] presents a way in which this can be quantified by a scalar L (referred to as likelihood) defined (when correlation is ignored) by "assumes a convenient form" in that it turns the product into a simple sum…”
Section: Joint Histogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is of clear interest to be able to quantify the similarity between two images. Equation (15) in [18] presents a way in which this can be quantified by a scalar L (referred to as likelihood) defined (when correlation is ignored) by "assumes a convenient form" in that it turns the product into a simple sum…”
Section: Joint Histogrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors believe that the combination of x-ray and neutron tomography provides an extremely valuable tool for the study of numerous meso-scale 3 mechanisms in concrete. In fact, in recent years, a number of neutron centres offer coupled x-ray and neutron tomography [14,15,16,17], providing complementary fields of attenuation. A better description of the phases of concrete can thus be obtained by combining both fields on the condition that they are spatially commensurable (i.e., with a common coordinate system).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bimodal datasets require registration to align the data from each modality. Although some cases have successfully used mutual information in the sample to achieve registration (Kim et al, 2014), in general it has been shown that, due to the complementary nature of the modalities, there is no guarantee that there will be similar local features in corresponding datasets (particularly with multiphase images) and it is therefore difficult to find a good registration solution based on common features within a sample (Kaestner et al, 2017). To overcome this difficulty, fiducial markers can be attached to a sample to aid in registration.…”
Section: Registrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neutron imaging offers a solution as many of the imaging techniques are similar but the mechanisms by which neutrons interact with matter are very different and hence different elements, in particular light elements such as hydrogen, provide strong contrast in a neutron image (Kaestner et al, 2017). A number of experiments have shown neutron imaging to be well suited to showing water dynamics, where X-ray imaging would have struggled (Menon et al, 2007;Matsushima et al, 2009;Moradi et al, 2011;Warren et al, 2013;Zarebanadkouki et al, 2013;Totzke et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The design wavelength of the setup is set at 4.1 Å, which was selected using the velocity selector available at the ICON imaging instrument of the Paul Scherrer Institute 16 . While the grating interferometer setup has a design wavelength, we will use a change in wavelength to scan the autocorrelation length of the setup and thus extract the projected density correlation function in each voxel of the tomogram.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%