2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10876-006-0089-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimetallic Cluster Provides a Higher Activity Electrocatalyst for Methanol Oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,14,20 The most active catalysts for methanol electro-oxidation are composed of highly dispersed, nanosized Pt-Ru particles deposited on a carbon support, but small variations in preparation conditions have a significant impact on activity. 47,48 In this work, the nucleation and growth of vapor deposited Pt, Ru and Pt-Ru clusters on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) are investigated and compared with bimetallic cluster growth via electroless deposition. 1,2,7,[26][27][28][29] Although colloidal and microemulsion preparation methods are known to deposit highly dispersed, nanosized Pt-Ru clusters, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] these methods require complex preparation procedures and expensive starting materials, making them ill-suited for commercial scale up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,14,20 The most active catalysts for methanol electro-oxidation are composed of highly dispersed, nanosized Pt-Ru particles deposited on a carbon support, but small variations in preparation conditions have a significant impact on activity. 47,48 In this work, the nucleation and growth of vapor deposited Pt, Ru and Pt-Ru clusters on highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) are investigated and compared with bimetallic cluster growth via electroless deposition. 1,2,7,[26][27][28][29] Although colloidal and microemulsion preparation methods are known to deposit highly dispersed, nanosized Pt-Ru clusters, [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] these methods require complex preparation procedures and expensive starting materials, making them ill-suited for commercial scale up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the pH value of solution is 10, the performance for methanol electrooxidation decreases, the reason may be that the PtRu/C catalyst with an atomic ratio of Pt to Ru of 1.2 deviates from the theoretical value of 1:1, indicating a lower utilisation of Ru, which in turn provides less OH species for Pt nanoparticles to oxidise methanol at lower-potential. Garcia and coworkers [34] also reported the non-uniform distributions of Pt and Ru atoms in catalysts which leaded to the inferior activity for methanol electrooxidation. The performance of homemade PtRu/C catalyst for methanol electrooxidation was also tested by the amperometric i-t curves at a constant potential of 0.6 V in an Ar-saturated solution of 0.…”
Section: Energy / Kev Energy / Kevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were mostly deposited on the intact support without particular pretreatment, but sometimes the occurrence of covalent interactions with the support was reported. Clusters have also already been incorporated on carbon [18][19][20][21][22] but without specific interactions. Nevertheless, to obtain active catalysts, the supported clusters have to be activated to remove the ligand shell and to obtain supported metallic particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%