2014
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% preservative-free ophthalmic solution versus bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Ganfort) for glaucoma or ocular hypertension: a 12-week randomised controlled trial

Abstract: AimTo compare the efficacy and safety of single-dose bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% preservative-free (PF) ophthalmic solution with bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.MethodsIn this multicentre, randomised, parallel-group study, patients were randomised to bimatoprost/timolol PF or bimatoprost/timolol once daily in the morning for 12 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoints, reflecting differing regional regulatory requirements, included chan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study comparing efficacy and safety of the preservative-free fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol with the preserved formulation, Goldberg and co-workers found a similar IOP-lowering efficacy of both formulations of −9.16 to −7.98 mmHg for the bimatoprost/timolol preservative-free group, and from −9.03 to −7.72 for the preserved formulation. Between 86.3 and 90.6% of patients treated with the preservative-free bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination achieved at least a 20% IOP reduction at week 12 24. These results are comparable to the findings of the present study in the subgroup of treatment-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In another study comparing efficacy and safety of the preservative-free fixed combination of bimatoprost and timolol with the preserved formulation, Goldberg and co-workers found a similar IOP-lowering efficacy of both formulations of −9.16 to −7.98 mmHg for the bimatoprost/timolol preservative-free group, and from −9.03 to −7.72 for the preserved formulation. Between 86.3 and 90.6% of patients treated with the preservative-free bimatoprost/timolol fixed combination achieved at least a 20% IOP reduction at week 12 24. These results are comparable to the findings of the present study in the subgroup of treatment-naïve patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…At each time point, examiners masked to the treatment assignment took 2 or 3 IOP measurements for each eye using a 2-person, masked reading method. 17 The primary efficacy outcome measure was time-matched IOP change from baseline.…”
Section: Rescue and Retreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, several BAK-free preserved and preservative-free formulations of ocular hypotensive monotherapies and fixed-dose combinations (e.g., tafluprost, travoprost, bimatoprost, brimonidine, timolol, fixed-combination travoprost/timolol, fixed-combination dorzolamide/timolol) are commercially available. The tolerability and IOP-lowering efficacy of preservative-free fixed-combination tafluprost/ timolol and preservative-free fixed-combination bimatoprost/ timolol were recently demonstrated in two multicenter, Phase III clinical studies that included patients sensitive or allergic to preservatives (bimatoprost/timolol study) [88,89]. Both medications were noninferior to their comparators (preservative-free tafluprost/preservative-free timolol non-fixed concomitant therapy and BAK-preserved, fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol, respectively).…”
Section: Exposure To Preservativesmentioning
confidence: 99%