1984
DOI: 10.1080/14640748408402163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bimanual Movement Control: Information processing and Interaction Effects

Abstract: Three experiments were designed to investigate the underlying processes in bimanual control. With one hand alone, or with both simultaneously, subjects moved styli from the midline of the body to lateral targets as quickly and accurately as possible. The distance moved and the weight of the styli were varied. Results of reaction time, movement time, and kinematic trajectory analyses question the conclusions of Kelso, Southard and Goodman (1979) regarding the synchronicity of movement of the two limbs. Temporal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
137
2
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 303 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
12
137
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the mixed condition the low and high ID movements resulted in different velocities, but the velocity profiles (e.g., time of peak velocity) were almost perfectly synchronous (also see Kelso, Putnam, & Goodman, 1983). In Experiments 2 and 3 the targets were placed so that movements were toward the midline or away from the body, yet the results were remarkably similar to that from Experiment 1 (also see Heuer & Klein, 2006;Marteniuk et al, 1984;Spijkers, Tachmatzidis, Debus, Fischer, & Kausche, 1994). Taken together, these findings were interpreted by Kelso et al as indicating that the Blimbs are constrained to act as a single unit^with the more difficult task appearing to determine the time course of both limb movements.…”
Section: Discrete and Discrete-reciprocal Bimanual Coordinationsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the mixed condition the low and high ID movements resulted in different velocities, but the velocity profiles (e.g., time of peak velocity) were almost perfectly synchronous (also see Kelso, Putnam, & Goodman, 1983). In Experiments 2 and 3 the targets were placed so that movements were toward the midline or away from the body, yet the results were remarkably similar to that from Experiment 1 (also see Heuer & Klein, 2006;Marteniuk et al, 1984;Spijkers, Tachmatzidis, Debus, Fischer, & Kausche, 1994). Taken together, these findings were interpreted by Kelso et al as indicating that the Blimbs are constrained to act as a single unit^with the more difficult task appearing to determine the time course of both limb movements.…”
Section: Discrete and Discrete-reciprocal Bimanual Coordinationsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…According to the crosstalk model, two independent motor plans exist for each limb and some fraction of the force commands for one limb is diverted to the other limb (Cattaert et al, 1999). It has been proposed that the movements produced by the symmetric activation of homologous muscles are stabilized when the contralateral and ipsilateral signals are integrated, while movements produced by the activation of nonhomologous muscles or asymmetric activation suffer from ongoing interference due to conflicting information and partial intermingling of signals controlling the two arms (e.g., Kagerer et al, 2003;Kennedy, Boyle, Rhee, & Shea, 2015a;Marteniuk, MacKenzie, & Baba, 1984).…”
Section: Action Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, such mechanisms may account for our observation that, in bimanual conditions, the rate of movement of the nonimpaired limb was reduced to that of the impaired limb. Explanations along similar lines have been put forward by Marteniuk et al (1984) and Swinnen et al (1991). When subjects are required to move a weighted and an unweighted stylus to a target, "assimilation" or synchronization effects are observed (Marteniuk et al 1985, experiment 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…It has been shown subsequently that absolute synchrony is not obtained in circumstances in which the asymmetry in task demands (target size, movement amplitude or hurdle height) is in-creased (e.g. Goodman et al 1983;Marteniuk et al 1984;Fowler et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In drawing geometric shapes, as used in the present study, control processes manage the topological characteristics of the shape as well as the spatial characteristics of the components (number of segments and changes in direction), which together exemplify the complexity of the task. The latter is of additional importance when performing bimanual acts during which spatial coupling represents an intrinsic constraint [16,31]. This organization evokes bimanual interactions through a coupling mechanism of which the dominant limb exerts a stronger influence on the nondominant limb than vice versa [9,13].…”
Section: Bimanual Drawing and Behavioural Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%