Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781108756181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilingual Grammar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 156 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We take the "language" of a given lexical item to be merely a convenient shorthand for its syntactic features, without ascribing any theoretical status to the fact that the lexical item is socially assigned to one named language or another. See López (2020) for more detailed discussion on this issue and an enlightening comparison of "languages" in code-switching with "languages" in post-creole continua. Hoot and Ebert…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take the "language" of a given lexical item to be merely a convenient shorthand for its syntactic features, without ascribing any theoretical status to the fact that the lexical item is socially assigned to one named language or another. See López (2020) for more detailed discussion on this issue and an enlightening comparison of "languages" in code-switching with "languages" in post-creole continua. Hoot and Ebert…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of negative evidence relating language mixing and learning, only the positive effects of freely using both languages in situations where they are contextually relevant and known to the speakers remain. Furthermore, the absence of negative consequences of using two separate codes might also speak in favor of theories that consider the bilingual linguistic repertoire as an integrated system rather than two separate ones [83][84][85].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 As far as we can tell, nothing hinges on whether the phase edge is DP (e.g. Svenonius 2004) or KP, as assumed in López (2020), with DP inheriting features from KP. Regardless, we assume that the semantic number clash issue must resolved prior to transfer of this phase.…”
Section: (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%