Bilingual flipcharts help improve oral health‐related knowledge and self‐efficacy of <scp>K</scp>orean‐<scp>A</scp>merican caregivers of preschoolers

Donald, L.; Ko, Anita; Kim, Jeffrey Y.

doi:10.1111/jphd.12073

Cited by 7 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…33 Eleven studies showed significant positive effect of the intervention on the knowledge, attitude and behaviour (toothbrushing and flossing) of their experiment gro ups. 18,19,21,23,24,[26][27][28]30,31,34 The positive impact of oral health education programme on knowledge, attitude and behaviour was consistent with the results of the review by Nakre and Harikiran (2013). Nakre and…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

“…Increase in knowledge could lead to the improvement of health education . Our findings suggested that oral health education based on theories have uprised the oral health knowledge, attitude and behaviour and can be used for the purpose of designing the theoretical framework of the interventions. Theoretical frameworks of the present study and the review by Brukiene and Aleksejuniene were alike .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

“…In addition, they reported that brushing child's teeth twice a day raised up to 82% while this behaviour before intervention was only 22%. Chi et al showed that the knowledge and self‐efficacy of caregivers statistically improved in significant way ( P < .001) after intervention. Angelopoulou et al reported that the difference in oral health knowledge in the intervention group compared to the control group at 3 and 6 months after the intervention was significant ( P < .001).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…articles [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] were selected after the quality assessment. We found 15 articles regarding the criteria mentioned for the A group with shortterm effects, 17 with long-term effects.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Chi et al 24 showed that the knowledge and self-efficacy of caregivers statistically improved in significant way (P < .001) after intervention.…”

Section: Short-term Effects Includementioning

confidence: 98%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Are educating and promoting interventions effective in oral health?: A systematic review

Ghaffari

Rakhshanderou

Ramezankhani

et al. 2017

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective It is estimated that about 20%‐25% of the world's population are suffering from periodontal diseases or severe gum diseases. This requires appropriate interventions. For the development of effective and evidence‐based programmes tailored to the target group, the aim of this review was to survey to the effectiveness of oral health education and promotion interventions in the relevant groups of people. Methods The electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science and Cochrane Library were searched for English language studies between 2010 and (January‐December) 2016. To assess the quality of articles, the checklist was used that includes 19 items. Studies were selected based on PICOs criteria, and finally, 16 studies were entered in our study. Results A total of 16 articles were selected, classified into two groups (A and B groups), so that group A with short‐term effects includes improving knowledge, attitudes, self‐efficacy, oral health behaviour (toothbrushing and flossing), theoretical constructs (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity and perceived behavioural control) which consists of 15 articles and group B with long‐term effects includes improving decayed teeth, plaque, calculus and bleeding which consists of six articles. Conclusion Approximately, this study supports effectiveness of all oral health education and promotion interventions, especially in short‐term outcomes. Regarding the importance of long‐term and short‐term outcomes for oral health education and promotion programmes, These interventions could be performed in the future with several target groups including family and teachers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 85%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 88%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Chi et al 24 showed that the knowledge and self-efficacy of caregivers statistically improved in significant way (P < .001) after intervention.…”

Section: Short-term Effects Includementioning

confidence: 98%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Are educating and promoting interventions effective in oral health?: A systematic review

Ghaffari

Rakhshanderou

Ramezankhani

et al. 2017

Int J Dental Hygiene

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Oral health knowledge, attitudes and practices of dietitians in Australia: A national survey

Patterson‐Norrie,

Ramjan,

Sousa

et al. 2024

Health Prom J of Aust

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AimDietitians are a well‐placed profession to be providing pre‐emptive oral health promotion. Despite recommendations that oral health promotion should be routinely part of dietetic practice, there is limited data informing the current practices of clinical dietitians in this area across Australia. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the knowledge and practices of Australian dietitians and oral health promotion.MethodsA cross‐sectional survey was undertaken involving registered clinical dietitians in Australia using purposive and snowballing sampling (social media/dietetic organisations/public databases). Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.ResultsA total of 149 dietitians participated in the national survey. Overall, dietitians were knowledgeable about oral health risk factors and preventative measures across general health domains. Majority of dietitians agreed that oral health can affect nutrition interventions (95.5%) and dietitians should be discussing oral health (88.0%). However, nearly half were not confident in providing counselling or education and felt that undergraduate training for oral health promotion was inadequate (78.2%). A small proportion (6.0%) of dietitians were already providing oral health promotion regularly. Key barriers included a lack of clear guidelines for practice, limited training opportunities and indistinct referral pathways.ConclusionDietitians have acknowledged that oral health promotion should be incorporated into their practice. However, they are challenged by a lack of resources and training to support this in clinical practice.So What?Capacity building dietitians to promote oral health allows opportunity for improvement in the oral health, nutritional status and quality of life of priority population groups.

show abstract

Improving Maternal Health Status in Indigenous Communities of Panama: Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions Among the Ngäbe-Buglé People of Panama

Calvo

Rebollon

2018

Global Maternal and Child Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bilingual flipcharts help improve oral health‐related knowledge and self‐efficacy of Korean‐American caregivers of preschoolers

Cited by 7 publications

References 7 publications

Are educating and promoting interventions effective in oral health?: A systematic review

Are educating and promoting interventions effective in oral health?: A systematic review

Oral health knowledge, attitudes and practices of dietitians in Australia: A national survey

Improving Maternal Health Status in Indigenous Communities of Panama: Community-Based Participatory Research and Interventions Among the Ngäbe-Buglé People of Panama

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About