2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.699401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliary Strictures and Cholangiocarcinoma – Untangling a Diagnostic Conundrum

Abstract: Cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon and highly aggressive biliary tract malignancy with few manifestations until late disease stages. Diagnosis is currently achieved through a combination of clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological techniques. A number of reported cancer biomarkers have the potential to be incorporated into diagnostic pathways, but all lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity limiting their possible use in screening and early diagnosis. The limitations of standard serum markers su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
(264 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no good predictive method for the prognosis of these high-risk PHC with venous invasion, especially lack of preoperative noninvasive predictive indicators. Most patients with PHC had jaundice or cholangitis, accounting for 54% of jaundice in our cohort, which may have contributed to the low predictive efficacy of carbohydrate antigen19-9 (CA19-9) ( 8 ). Pathologic evaluation is the gold standard for predicting prognosis, but it can only be properly evaluated postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, there is no good predictive method for the prognosis of these high-risk PHC with venous invasion, especially lack of preoperative noninvasive predictive indicators. Most patients with PHC had jaundice or cholangitis, accounting for 54% of jaundice in our cohort, which may have contributed to the low predictive efficacy of carbohydrate antigen19-9 (CA19-9) ( 8 ). Pathologic evaluation is the gold standard for predicting prognosis, but it can only be properly evaluated postoperatively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The diagnosis was in the middle and late stages. [43][44][45] Therefore, the cohort study is concentrated on stage III and is also reasonable. We used the comparison of the area under the ROC when evaluating the two staging systems in our research, showing the discrimination and single trend of the two staging systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis was in the middle and late stages. [43–45] Therefore, the cohort study is concentrated on stage III and is also reasonable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highly aggressive CCA, arising from the bile duct epithelium, constitutes the second most frequent cause of MBSs. CCA can be classified into intrahepatic, perihilar, or distal types, with perihilar cases accounting for 60 to 70% of occurrences ( 5 ). Initially, patients with CCA are usually asymptomatic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up to 15% of patients with PSC will develop CCA, with the highest incidence 2-5 years into diagnosis ( 6 ). Unfortunately, CCAs are marked by poor prognoses, with an overall five-year survival rate of less than 20% ( 5 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%