2005
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.3.01840812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biliary Complications After Liver Transplantation: Diagnosis with MR Cholangiopancreatography

Abstract: MRCP is a useful imaging procedure in the assessment of biliary complications after OLT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
64
1
14

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
64
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…This high frequency of good viewing was expected and was in agreement with the results from other authors 18,26 , and this reflects the capacity of present-day magnetic resonance apparatus to produce bile duct images of trustworthy diagnostic quality. We adopted the practice of informing the observer regarding the type of bile duct anastomosis that had been used, since the lack of this information could lead to errors in interpreting the findings (such that, in cases of biliodigestive derivation, the remaining part of the receiver duct could be interpreted as the distal bile duct associated with apparent anastomotic stenosis).…”
Section: Viewing Of the Bile Ductssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This high frequency of good viewing was expected and was in agreement with the results from other authors 18,26 , and this reflects the capacity of present-day magnetic resonance apparatus to produce bile duct images of trustworthy diagnostic quality. We adopted the practice of informing the observer regarding the type of bile duct anastomosis that had been used, since the lack of this information could lead to errors in interpreting the findings (such that, in cases of biliodigestive derivation, the remaining part of the receiver duct could be interpreted as the distal bile duct associated with apparent anastomotic stenosis).…”
Section: Viewing Of the Bile Ductssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was found only one case with abnormalities seen on CPMR that was not subsequently confirmed. This was a diagnosis of anastomotic stenosis seen on CPMR that was not confirmed by ERCP, thus giving the method specificity of 95.45%, which is compatible with other studies in the literature [18][19][20]23,26 . After analyzing the images from this case, we had the impression that the observers overvalued the "hour glass" appearance that is sometimes present at the anastomosis location.…”
Section: Viewing Of the Bile Ductssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations