1974
DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(74)90373-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilharzial (schistosomal) ureteritis cystica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of stone in the bilharzial ureter should not necessarily suggest that a distal stricture is present. Saad and Hanafy (1974) have suggested that many of these calculi are caused, not by chronic stasis, but by crystalloids being trapped in areas of cystic change in the ureteric epithelium. These then grow and are shed into the ureteric lumen as calculi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of stone in the bilharzial ureter should not necessarily suggest that a distal stricture is present. Saad and Hanafy (1974) have suggested that many of these calculi are caused, not by chronic stasis, but by crystalloids being trapped in areas of cystic change in the ureteric epithelium. These then grow and are shed into the ureteric lumen as calculi.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of a stone in a bilharzial ureter should not be taken as evidence of a stricture distal to the stone. S. M. Saad and H. M. Hanafy have suggested that some calculi are caused by crystalloids trapped in areas of cystic change in the ureteral epithelium 11 These grow and eventually they may shed into the lumen of the ureter as calculi. We believe that one of our cases demonstrates such developing but undelivered calculi.…”
Section: The Plain Filmmentioning
confidence: 99%