Abstract:Low late mortality and a low incidence of valve-related events can be achieved for at least 30 years using mechanical bileaflet valve replacement. Persistent atrial fibrillation is a significant risk factor for morbidity and mortality.
“…4 During 34-year follow-up, the mortality rate was 0.59%/year for cardiac death and 0.69%/year for valverelated death. 4 At multivariable analysis, the Authors found that male sex was associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.11-1.42, P = .0003), but the analysis was not apparently adjusted for comorbidities and antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulation quality. 4 We found low anticoagulation quality, high INR range, ageing and comorbidities as the most important factors associated with mortality, both in the aortic and mitral MPHV group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4 At multivariable analysis, the Authors found that male sex was associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.11-1.42, P = .0003), but the analysis was not apparently adjusted for comorbidities and antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulation quality. 4 We found low anticoagulation quality, high INR range, ageing and comorbidities as the most important factors associated with mortality, both in the aortic and mitral MPHV group. Our finding that low TiTR < 60% is associated with an increased mortality risk supports and extends previous evidence that high variability of INR was associated with poor survival in patients undergoing single valve replacement (HR 1.8 per 20% increase).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPHV having less thrombogenicity. 4 Furthermore, no data on antithrombotic treatments, in particular on oral anticoagulation, were reported in those studies. This last point is particularly important as MPHV patients require long-term oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to reduce the risk of valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, and mortality.…”
Valve replacement with biological or mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHV) represents a therapeutic option that allowed a marked improvement in the long-term prognosis of patients with valvular heart disease, with MPHV possibly being associated with a slightly better 10-and 15-year survival than biological valves in patients aged 50-70 years 1 and lower valve-related morbidity. 2 In a large study performed in the 90's including elderly high-risk patients undergoing valve replacement, the incidence rate of mortality in the group of MPHV receivers was 9.6%/year. 3 However, the types of MPHV have changed over the last decades with the new bi-leaflet
“…4 During 34-year follow-up, the mortality rate was 0.59%/year for cardiac death and 0.69%/year for valverelated death. 4 At multivariable analysis, the Authors found that male sex was associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.11-1.42, P = .0003), but the analysis was not apparently adjusted for comorbidities and antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulation quality. 4 We found low anticoagulation quality, high INR range, ageing and comorbidities as the most important factors associated with mortality, both in the aortic and mitral MPHV group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4 At multivariable analysis, the Authors found that male sex was associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.25, 95%CI 1.11-1.42, P = .0003), but the analysis was not apparently adjusted for comorbidities and antithrombotic treatments, including anticoagulation quality. 4 We found low anticoagulation quality, high INR range, ageing and comorbidities as the most important factors associated with mortality, both in the aortic and mitral MPHV group. Our finding that low TiTR < 60% is associated with an increased mortality risk supports and extends previous evidence that high variability of INR was associated with poor survival in patients undergoing single valve replacement (HR 1.8 per 20% increase).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MPHV having less thrombogenicity. 4 Furthermore, no data on antithrombotic treatments, in particular on oral anticoagulation, were reported in those studies. This last point is particularly important as MPHV patients require long-term oral anticoagulation therapy with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to reduce the risk of valve thrombosis, thromboembolism, and mortality.…”
Valve replacement with biological or mechanical prosthetic heart valves (MPHV) represents a therapeutic option that allowed a marked improvement in the long-term prognosis of patients with valvular heart disease, with MPHV possibly being associated with a slightly better 10-and 15-year survival than biological valves in patients aged 50-70 years 1 and lower valve-related morbidity. 2 In a large study performed in the 90's including elderly high-risk patients undergoing valve replacement, the incidence rate of mortality in the group of MPHV receivers was 9.6%/year. 3 However, the types of MPHV have changed over the last decades with the new bi-leaflet
“…The open-label, single-center randomized controlled noninferiority trial 19 In a 30-year retrospective cohort analysis of 950 AVR at a single center in Japan, 88.6%, 89.8%, and 94.4% of AVR patients were free from valve-related mortality, thromboembolic events, and bleeding events, respectively, after 30 years when anticoagulated to a target INR of 1.6 to 2.5. 20 Atrial fibrillation independently predicted increased risk of TE and age older than 70 years, and previous operation independently predicted anticoagulation-related hemorrhage. Although this study helps to justify lower INR goals, it is important to note that lower target INR goals have been proposed in Japan due to a higher risk of warfarin-related intracranial hemorrhage and these same goals may not be appropriate in Caucasian populations.…”
The INR goals of 2 to 3 for low risk and 2.5 to 3.5 for high risk should be considered for bileaflet mechanical aortic valve recipients. Additionally, a lower INR goal of 2 to 3 for the first 3 months after valve replacement followed by an INR goal of 1.5 to 2.5 in both low- and high-risk aortic On-X valve recipients may be considered.
“…Traditional open-chest surgery has the advantage of good exposure of the surgical field, which can markedly shorten cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) times, but also has disadvantages of large surgical wounds, more bleeding, severe pain, and slow postoperative recovery [7,8] . Total thoracoscopic and thoracoscopic-assisted cardiac surgery have emerged in recent years [9-11] .…”
Objective
To analyze and summarize the clinical safety and feasibility of minimally
invasive video-assisted mitral valve replacement via a right thoracic
minimal incision in patients aged over 65 years.
Methods
The clinical data of 45 patients over 65 years old who had mitral valve
disease were analyzed retrospectively from January 2014 to January 2017 at
Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University. The patients were divided into
two groups; 20 patients in group A, who underwent minimally invasive
video-assisted mitral valve replacement via a right thoracic minimal
incision, and 25 patients in group B, who underwent conventional mitral
valve replacement. We collected and analyzed their relevant clinical
data.
Results
The operation was completed successfully in both groups. Compared with group
B, group A was clearly superior for postoperative analgesia time,
postoperative hospital length of stay, thoracic drainage liquid, blood
transfusion, and length of incision. There were no differences between the
two groups in postoperative severe complications and mortality. More
patients in group B had pulmonary infections and poor incision healing,
while more patients in group A had postoperative pneumothorax and
subcutaneous emphysema.
Conclusion
In patients aged over 65 years, minimally invasive video-assisted mitral
valve replacement with a small incision in the right chest had the same
clinical safety and efficacy as the conventional method.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.