2011
DOI: 10.1038/nphys2089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilayer manganites reveal polarons in the midst of a metallic breakdown

Abstract: The exact nature of the low temperature electronic phase of the manganite materials family, and hence the origin of their colossal magnetoresistant (CMR) effect, is still under heavy debate. By combining new photoemission and tunneling data, we show that in La 2-2x Sr 1+2x Mn 2 O 7 the polaronic degrees of freedom win out across the CMR region of the phase diagram. This means that the generic ground state is that of a system in which strong electron-lattice interactions result in vanishing coherent quasi-parti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, this basic picture appears to be conceptually insufficient to describe the physics of manganites, in general, and LSMO, in particular [5]: the strong role of polaron effects in manganites has been pointed out [6], and good experimental evidence has been provided by a variety of methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, manganites were proposed as an example of a polaron Fermi liquid [7].Although the presence of polarons in the metallic phase of LSMO (down to 6 K) has been demonstrated by optical * patrizio.graziosi@gmail.com conductivity and reflectivity [8,9] and a polaron metal phase has been indicated in metallic La 2−2x Sr 1+2x Mn 2 O 7 by angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy [14] and neutron scattering [15], explicit evidence of the polaron effects from transport characterizations was, up to now, still missing. Indeed, despite these convincing proves, the dominating trend in literature is to describe the resistivity of manganites via a T 2 + T 5 behavior, ignoring, thus, the polaron effects (see, for instance, a very recent communication in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, this basic picture appears to be conceptually insufficient to describe the physics of manganites, in general, and LSMO, in particular [5]: the strong role of polaron effects in manganites has been pointed out [6], and good experimental evidence has been provided by a variety of methods [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Moreover, manganites were proposed as an example of a polaron Fermi liquid [7].Although the presence of polarons in the metallic phase of LSMO (down to 6 K) has been demonstrated by optical * patrizio.graziosi@gmail.com conductivity and reflectivity [8,9] and a polaron metal phase has been indicated in metallic La 2−2x Sr 1+2x Mn 2 O 7 by angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy [14] and neutron scattering [15], explicit evidence of the polaron effects from transport characterizations was, up to now, still missing. Indeed, despite these convincing proves, the dominating trend in literature is to describe the resistivity of manganites via a T 2 + T 5 behavior, ignoring, thus, the polaron effects (see, for instance, a very recent communication in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presence of polarons in the metallic phase of LSMO (down to 6 K) has been demonstrated by optical * patrizio.graziosi@gmail.com conductivity and reflectivity [8,9] and a polaron metal phase has been indicated in metallic La 2−2x Sr 1+2x Mn 2 O 7 by angleresolved photoemission spectroscopy [14] and neutron scattering [15], explicit evidence of the polaron effects from transport characterizations was, up to now, still missing. Indeed, despite these convincing proves, the dominating trend in literature is to describe the resistivity of manganites via a T 2 + T 5 behavior, ignoring, thus, the polaron effects (see, for instance, a very recent communication in Ref.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 In many oxide materials [13,14] the insulator-metal transition has been discussed in terms of freezing in fluctuating lattice and electronic (charge, spin and orbital) order, sometimes in combination with the occurrence of phase separation [15,16]. However, due to the many competing degrees of freedom, the close energetic proximity of the different phases often obscures the exact nature of these phase transitions as they are probed in thermal equilibrium [17]. In magnetite, the Verwey transition does not involve changes in the spin ordering, allowing a focus purely on the role of the lattice and electronic ordering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,17 On the other hand, quasi-particle peaks observed in several experiments subsequently [19][20][21] has been attributed to the intergrowth present in the experimental samples by a recent scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) combined with ARPES, thus reaffirming the pseudogap structure associated with the Fermi surface. 22 The persistent CE-type dynamical short-range charge-orbital correlations in the ferromagnetic metallic phase at x = 0.4, apart from being responsible for the pseudo-gap structure in the Fermi surface, yields a strong renormalization of phonons near the wavevector (0.5π, 0.5π, 0) observed in the inelastic neutron scattering, 4 which is believed to be resulting from the strong Fermi surface nesting in the ferromangetic metallic state. As the hole pocket corresponding to the bonding portion of the Fermi surface has nearly straight segments in comparison to the antibonding portions, bonding-bonding nesting has been suggested 16,23 to be responsible for the nano-scale charge-orbital correlations in the ferromagnetic metallic phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%