2017
DOI: 10.16956/jes.2017.17.4.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Vocal Palsy After Total Thyroidectomy: Expert Opinion on Two Malpractice Claims

Abstract: Two patients complained of hoarseness, respiratory distress and swallowing disorders early after total bilateral thyroidectomy for multinodular goiter and cancer, respectively. Faulty surgical techniques had caused injury to bilateral recurrent laryngeal nerves (RLNs) during thyroidectomy and the associated central lymph node dissection. The operation notes showed no statement regarding the identification, dissection, exposure and/or functional integrity of the RLN on either side of the thyroid and no mention … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the concerns relating to guidelines in the field of IONM is related to their medicolegal implications (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Some reports suggest that the courts are applying new clinical practice guidelines in their decision-making processes, it is worthwhile to anecdotally recall a case in which a patient sustained RLN palsy after thyroid surgery, and the plaintiffs' expert supported the view that IONM was considered the standard of care (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Is It Evidence-based?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the concerns relating to guidelines in the field of IONM is related to their medicolegal implications (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Some reports suggest that the courts are applying new clinical practice guidelines in their decision-making processes, it is worthwhile to anecdotally recall a case in which a patient sustained RLN palsy after thyroid surgery, and the plaintiffs' expert supported the view that IONM was considered the standard of care (13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Is It Evidence-based?mentioning
confidence: 99%