2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-015-0080-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral vocal fold immobility: a 13 year review of etiologies, management and the utility of the empey index

Abstract: BackgroundBilateral vocal fold immobility (BVFI) is a rare diagnosis causing dyspnea, dysphonia and dysphagia. Management depends on respiratory performance, airway patency, vocal ability, and quality-of-life priorities. The authors review the presentation, management and outcome in patients diagnosed with BVFI. The utility and efficacy of the Empey index (EI) and the Expiratory Disproportion Index (EDI) are evaluated as an objective monitoring tools for BVFI patients.MethodsA 13-year retrospective review was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our series, eighteen of tracheostomized patients (72%) were decanulated while seven patients (28%) were still on tracheostomy despite laser cordectomy. In a study by Maria K et al, 2 the decanulation rate was 42% while 5% failed decanulation. In another Italian study done on 13 patients of BVCP, 3 out of 10 failed decanulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In our series, eighteen of tracheostomized patients (72%) were decanulated while seven patients (28%) were still on tracheostomy despite laser cordectomy. In a study by Maria K et al, 2 the decanulation rate was 42% while 5% failed decanulation. In another Italian study done on 13 patients of BVCP, 3 out of 10 failed decanulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The evaluation of FEF50/FIF50 ratio, EDI, TPI, and PQ failed to detect any significant difference in the respiratory function 6 months postimplantation compared with the preimplantation visit. Due to the limited sample size of our study and the inclusion of four of seven patients with a previous glottic enlargement, it is impossible to determine whether these parameters are not compatible with the evaluation of respiratory problems associated with the BVFP onset or whether the lack of statistically significant results is merely due to the limited sample size and heterogeneity of the study population. Accordingly, these parameters should be retested in larger and homogeneous cohorts, and the results compared with those of patients who underwent a standard glottic enlargement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…decannulation rates show a high variability among the published results. This is most likely due to the methodological limitations of the most BVFP studies, in terms of design, sample size, control of biases, recruitment type, and selection criteria [711].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%