2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2015.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Transposition Lip Flaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This technique avoided the 2-stage surgery while ensuring cosmetic appearance as well as functional restoration of the lip. 20 Robinson et al 4 designed a frogger flap, which reliably reconstructed central upper lip defects while preserving satisfactory function and aesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This technique avoided the 2-stage surgery while ensuring cosmetic appearance as well as functional restoration of the lip. 20 Robinson et al 4 designed a frogger flap, which reliably reconstructed central upper lip defects while preserving satisfactory function and aesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jacono and colleagues discussed a novel technique, the bilateral transposition flap, which allowed for a single-stage reconstruction of central lip defects, including Cupid’s bow and philtrum. This technique avoided the 2-stage surgery while ensuring cosmetic appearance as well as functional restoration of the lip 20. Robinson et al4 designed a frogger flap, which reliably reconstructed central upper lip defects while preserving satisfactory function and aesthetics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Alternative reconstructive options include wedge excision, local advancement flaps (including O-Z and V-Y flaps), rhomboid/transposition flaps and the Abbe flap. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Wedge excision and local advancement flaps quickly distort facial symmetry when applied to defects with both vermillion and cutaneous components. 5 The Abbe flap is an option but requires tissue harvest and complete denervation of a central lower lip segment, creating another potential site of aesthetic distortion and wound healing.…”
Section: Ideas and Innovationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, it was felt that the defect was too large for repair with bilateral transposition flaps or double island pedicle flaps as described previously. 1,2 The surgical defect was also considered to be too large in the horizontal direction to consider a linear closure, wedge resection, or O-to-T or Oto-L type advancement flaps. There was concern that second intention healing or a skin graft would have led to excessive scarring and loss of anatomic landmarks, given the size of the defect and the age of the patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%