2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000150569.93262.64
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases the Propensity to Trip on an Obstacle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with studies reporting successful single-stage total hip or total knee replacement. 18,19,21 Although not proven in our study, the data suggests that this may be associated with significant socioeconomic benefits. This is particularly important because functional gain was significantly higher for patients undergoing single-stage treatment in our series.…”
Section: Parameters Measured * Pre-operative Post-operative Differenccontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with studies reporting successful single-stage total hip or total knee replacement. 18,19,21 Although not proven in our study, the data suggests that this may be associated with significant socioeconomic benefits. This is particularly important because functional gain was significantly higher for patients undergoing single-stage treatment in our series.…”
Section: Parameters Measured * Pre-operative Post-operative Differenccontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Some reports have found that single-stage bilateral total knee and hip arthroplasty is associated with a higher morbidity and mortality rate because of thromboembolic complications. 2,[18][19][20][21] To our knowledge, there are no reports of single-stage TSA in the literature. Nor are there established indications or contraindications for single-stage TSA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Significant improvement in WOMAC post-TKR Less strength and poorer proprioception for the EG post-TKR compared with the CG Mandeville et al [ 32 ] EG: n= 19(14F) Age: 64.0±7.74. CG: n=21(13F) Age: 63.1±4.26 Inclusion: end-stage OA undergoing TKR VAS; WOMAC; obstacle overcoming; kinematic displacement on force platform during gait Within 2 pre-TKR weeks and 6-month post-TKR Improvement in WOMAC post-surgery Impaired dynamic balance in EG vs controls Poorer gait stability in EG (smaller displacement COM/COG) than CG EG and CG cross obstacles similarly Mauer et al [ 33 ] EG: n=29(19F) Age 72, 6±5,4, bilateral (BL) TKR. CG: n=27(17F) Age 70, 6±5,5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knee stiVness may further contribute to forward falls by interfering with the rapid knee Xexion movements that are required to avoid tripping over obstacles (Pijnappels et al 2005). Indeed, patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty have a reduced ability to negotiate obstacles, and this increases their risk of tripping (Mauer et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%