2009
DOI: 10.1186/1749-8090-4-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral sternobronchial fistula after coronary surgery – are the retained epicardial pacing wires responsible? a case report

Abstract: Background: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are routinely used during cardiac surgery; they are dependable in controlling postoperative arrhythmias and are associated with low morbitity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reported complications are rare and include bleeding, vascular perforation, atrial or ventricular laceration during wire removal with tamponade, avulsion/laceration of Case Report saphenous vein graft, infection, sternobronchial fistula and even cardiac strangulation by wire ensnarement during removal of wires [1][2][3][4]. Retained pacing wires may rarely also migrate and trans-bronchial, lung, pelvic and transepidermal migration of pacing wires has also been reported [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Reported complications are rare and include bleeding, vascular perforation, atrial or ventricular laceration during wire removal with tamponade, avulsion/laceration of Case Report saphenous vein graft, infection, sternobronchial fistula and even cardiac strangulation by wire ensnarement during removal of wires [1][2][3][4]. Retained pacing wires may rarely also migrate and trans-bronchial, lung, pelvic and transepidermal migration of pacing wires has also been reported [5][6][7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The second report involved a pacing wire that migrated via the left atrium and left ventricle into the right carotid artery causing an infective endocarditis of the mitral and aortic valve 13. An article published in 2008 queried the use of TEPWs;14 in 2009, another article questioned whether retained pacing wires were the culprit for the development of a sternobronchial fistula that arose in a patient following coronary surgery 15. In 2011, a patient suffered from the development of a right paracardiac mass due to an organised haematoma around retained epicardial pacing wires following aortic valve replacement 16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 3 4 ] On the other hand, infections of sternal wounds account for some of the most serious complications postoperatively for mediastinal sternotomies. [ 5 ] They give morbidity rates at an incidence of 0.4–5%, and mortality rates within the hospital reach 7–29%, even after the correct treatment of mediastinitis is accounted for. [ 5 ] Taking into account the aforementioned, although retained pacing wires are part of a routine procedure, which is well tolerated, it is important to note that complications do occur and they need to be considered when they are left in situ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%