2021
DOI: 10.34057/ppj.2020.39.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Sacrospineous Colposupension in the treatment of female genital prolapse: Risk-Benefit Considerations and Six Months Follow-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of erosion is likely related to the characteristics of the mesh (ultra-lightweight: 21 g/m 2 , monofilament, macroporous with pore size >1.9 mm, and 93% porosity) leading to rapid anatomical integration and a reduced foreign body tissue reaction. Indeed, a preliminary histopathological analysis of a BSC mesh™ (a case of total hysterectomy in a patient with the BSC mesh™) reported minimal body foreign reaction with "limited fibrosis around each individual mesh fiber without confluence" [18]. Larger prospective multicenter cohorts are still needed to confirm outcomes of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The absence of erosion is likely related to the characteristics of the mesh (ultra-lightweight: 21 g/m 2 , monofilament, macroporous with pore size >1.9 mm, and 93% porosity) leading to rapid anatomical integration and a reduced foreign body tissue reaction. Indeed, a preliminary histopathological analysis of a BSC mesh™ (a case of total hysterectomy in a patient with the BSC mesh™) reported minimal body foreign reaction with "limited fibrosis around each individual mesh fiber without confluence" [18]. Larger prospective multicenter cohorts are still needed to confirm outcomes of our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Hemtenmacher et al [18] reported a series of 132 patients with a 6-month follow-up: there was no recurrence of prolapse at 6 months for the 56 patients (56/132 = 42%) following the invitation for the physical examination at 6 months. Neither rectal injury nor mesh erosion was observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%