2020
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral retinal detachment after chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy

Abstract: Key Points CAR T-cell targeting of leukemic infiltrates in the optic nerve and retina caused retinal detachment as a presentation of pseudoprogression. Treatment of this intraocular inflammation with intravitreal triamcinolone and orbital radiation led to marked improvement in visual acuity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience demonstrates the ability of BRT to effectively treat bulky symptomatic extramedullary leukemic disease in critical sites with minimal toxicity, in order to achieve disease control, and also to prevent potential CAR‐T‐associated organ toxicity. Similarly, BRT prior to and following CAR‐T in another B‐ALL patient provided local ocular disease control, permitting successful treatment 24 . In our case, the use of BRT targeting the heart was an effective strategy to mitigate potential cardiac toxicity in a tenuous patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our experience demonstrates the ability of BRT to effectively treat bulky symptomatic extramedullary leukemic disease in critical sites with minimal toxicity, in order to achieve disease control, and also to prevent potential CAR‐T‐associated organ toxicity. Similarly, BRT prior to and following CAR‐T in another B‐ALL patient provided local ocular disease control, permitting successful treatment 24 . In our case, the use of BRT targeting the heart was an effective strategy to mitigate potential cardiac toxicity in a tenuous patient.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Similarly, BRT prior to and following CAR-T in another B-ALL patient provided local ocular disease control, permitting successful treatment. 24 In our case, the use of BRT targeting the heart was an effective strategy to mitigate potential cardiac toxicity in a tenuous patient. This is the first report of cardiac and GI BRT in the pre-CAR setting for ALL, and supports future studies of BRT in R/R B-ALL patients with extramedullary involvement, to improve candidacy for CAR-T therapy and potentially reduce relative toxicity risk.…”
Section: Debulking and Brtmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Table 1 summarizes all reported cases of leukemia and lymphoma that presented pseudo-progression during CAR-T therapy. [2][3][4][5] This patient showed a rapid enlargement of EL with heat and pain after administration of CAR-T cells. Clinical course and serum interleukin-6 dominant cytokine profile (data not shown ) along with the time course of CRS indicated a pseudo-progression but not true-progression of EL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2,3 The changes in extramedullary lesion (EL) of relapsed or refractory ALL after CAR T-cell therapy have been recognized only in a few cases. 4,5 We report herewith pseudo-progression as an augmented immune response to the EL in a boy with relapsed infant ALL after CAR T-cell therapy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This concept is supported by the simultaneous presence of CD19 + blasts within the anterior chamber of the left eye in complete absence of T cells while no CD19 + events could be detected within the BM or peripheral blood ( figure 1 , figure 2C, D ). CD19-CAR T cells have been previously described to infiltrate immune privileged sites beyond the CNS, documented by, for example, a recent case report on bilateral retinal detachment after CD19-CAR T-cell therapy in a patient with retinal infiltration 19 and by the efficacy of CD19-CAR T cells in testicular CD19 + leukemia. 20–22 In addition to local immune escape, mechanisms of insufficient CAR T-cell persistence may have led to relapse in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%