“…Similar stories are reported from France and Sweden. Companies in the Paris region recruited workers from the Turkish textile industry through networks in the western parts of Turkey (Kastoryano 1990), while Swedish employers from the Stockholm area organised migrant labour via tourist passports, from Kulu, a small city in the Konya region in the early 1960s (Bayram, Nyquist, Thorburn & Bilgel 2009;Lundström 1991). : 1964-1974 Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden gained importance in quantitative terms after 1964 when all three countries reached nearly full employment, which triggered large-scale recruitment of foreign workers from Turkey.…”
Section: Periods Of Turkish Immigration To Austria France and Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the recruitment agreement between Sweden and Turkey did not change the migration process (E.M. Sund 2004). While Austria and France received most Turkish workers through the regulated outward system organised by the Turkish employment service (IIBK), labour migration to Sweden continued as a self-organised process, as in the pre-agreement years (Lundberg & Svanberg 1991;Lundström 1991).…”
Section: Recruitment Agreements With Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with these figures, the foreign workforce in Austria, Sweden and France markedly 4 It further explains why some regions within Turkey had higher rates of out migration compared to others and serves as an explanation for the frequently observed clusters of Turkish villagers in specific areas and neighbourhoods in the receiving countries. Many studies on Turkish immigrants in Western European countries have documented common regional areas from the homeland among Turks in Western Europe (Wilpert 1992), such as for example the aforementioned 'Kulu community' based in the Stockholm area (Lundström 1991). decreased after 1974.…”
Section: The Recruitment Stop and Family Reunification: 1974-1985mentioning
Acknowledgements 1 The Educational Mobility of the European Second Generation A Three-Country Comparison 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Ethnic educational inequalities: A theoretical framework 1.3 Research questions and design 1.4 Structure of the book 2 The Worlds of Turkish Fathers and Mothers 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Periods of Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden 2.3 Policy responses by the three receiving countries 2.3.1 Austria 2.3.2 France 2.3.3 Sweden 2.4 Turkish immigrants in five urban destinations 2.5 Comparing the relative positions of the parental generation across five cities 2.6 Conclusion 3 An Initial Look at Education Outcomes 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Education levels reached by young adults in Austria, France and Sweden 3.3 Accounting for compositional differences 3.4 Inter-generational educational mobility 3.5 Conclusion 4 Behind the Scenes: The Family Examined 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Parental involvement as social capital 4.3 Older siblings' involvement as social capital 4.4 Do Turkish families muster more family support for education? 4.5 Conclusion 5 Beyond the Family: Peers and Teachers 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Social relationships with peers and teachers 5.3 Peer group characteristics of the Turkish second generation 5.4 Student-teacher relationships among the Turkish second generation 5.5 Peers and teachers as mediating actors in processes of educational attainment 5.6 Differences between the comparison group and secondgeneration Turks 5.7 Conclusion 6 Navigating the System 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Education pathways compared-the perspective on institutional arrangements 6.2.1 France 6.2.2 Sweden 6.2.3 Austria 6.3 Conclusion 7 Interactions between Individual-level and Institutional-level Factors 7.1 Introduction 7.2 What causes inequalities in education careers within systems?
“…Similar stories are reported from France and Sweden. Companies in the Paris region recruited workers from the Turkish textile industry through networks in the western parts of Turkey (Kastoryano 1990), while Swedish employers from the Stockholm area organised migrant labour via tourist passports, from Kulu, a small city in the Konya region in the early 1960s (Bayram, Nyquist, Thorburn & Bilgel 2009;Lundström 1991). : 1964-1974 Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden gained importance in quantitative terms after 1964 when all three countries reached nearly full employment, which triggered large-scale recruitment of foreign workers from Turkey.…”
Section: Periods Of Turkish Immigration To Austria France and Swedenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the recruitment agreement between Sweden and Turkey did not change the migration process (E.M. Sund 2004). While Austria and France received most Turkish workers through the regulated outward system organised by the Turkish employment service (IIBK), labour migration to Sweden continued as a self-organised process, as in the pre-agreement years (Lundberg & Svanberg 1991;Lundström 1991).…”
Section: Recruitment Agreements With Turkeymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with these figures, the foreign workforce in Austria, Sweden and France markedly 4 It further explains why some regions within Turkey had higher rates of out migration compared to others and serves as an explanation for the frequently observed clusters of Turkish villagers in specific areas and neighbourhoods in the receiving countries. Many studies on Turkish immigrants in Western European countries have documented common regional areas from the homeland among Turks in Western Europe (Wilpert 1992), such as for example the aforementioned 'Kulu community' based in the Stockholm area (Lundström 1991). decreased after 1974.…”
Section: The Recruitment Stop and Family Reunification: 1974-1985mentioning
Acknowledgements 1 The Educational Mobility of the European Second Generation A Three-Country Comparison 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Ethnic educational inequalities: A theoretical framework 1.3 Research questions and design 1.4 Structure of the book 2 The Worlds of Turkish Fathers and Mothers 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Periods of Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden 2.3 Policy responses by the three receiving countries 2.3.1 Austria 2.3.2 France 2.3.3 Sweden 2.4 Turkish immigrants in five urban destinations 2.5 Comparing the relative positions of the parental generation across five cities 2.6 Conclusion 3 An Initial Look at Education Outcomes 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Education levels reached by young adults in Austria, France and Sweden 3.3 Accounting for compositional differences 3.4 Inter-generational educational mobility 3.5 Conclusion 4 Behind the Scenes: The Family Examined 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Parental involvement as social capital 4.3 Older siblings' involvement as social capital 4.4 Do Turkish families muster more family support for education? 4.5 Conclusion 5 Beyond the Family: Peers and Teachers 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Social relationships with peers and teachers 5.3 Peer group characteristics of the Turkish second generation 5.4 Student-teacher relationships among the Turkish second generation 5.5 Peers and teachers as mediating actors in processes of educational attainment 5.6 Differences between the comparison group and secondgeneration Turks 5.7 Conclusion 6 Navigating the System 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Education pathways compared-the perspective on institutional arrangements 6.2.1 France 6.2.2 Sweden 6.2.3 Austria 6.3 Conclusion 7 Interactions between Individual-level and Institutional-level Factors 7.1 Introduction 7.2 What causes inequalities in education careers within systems?
Acknowledgements 1 The Educational Mobility of the European Second Generation A Three-Country Comparison 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Ethnic educational inequalities: A theoretical framework 1.3 Research questions and design 1.4 Structure of the book 2 The Worlds of Turkish Fathers and Mothers 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Periods of Turkish immigration to Austria, France and Sweden 2.3 Policy responses by the three receiving countries 2.3.1 Austria 2.3.2 France 2.3.3 Sweden 2.4 Turkish immigrants in five urban destinations 2.5 Comparing the relative positions of the parental generation across five cities 2.6 Conclusion 3 An Initial Look at Education Outcomes 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Education levels reached by young adults in Austria, France and Sweden 3.3 Accounting for compositional differences 3.4 Inter-generational educational mobility 3.5 Conclusion 4 Behind the Scenes: The Family Examined 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Parental involvement as social capital 4.3 Older siblings' involvement as social capital 4.4 Do Turkish families muster more family support for education? 4.5 Conclusion 5 Beyond the Family: Peers and Teachers 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Social relationships with peers and teachers 5.3 Peer group characteristics of the Turkish second generation 5.4 Student-teacher relationships among the Turkish second generation 5.5 Peers and teachers as mediating actors in processes of educational attainment 5.6 Differences between the comparison group and secondgeneration Turks 5.7 Conclusion 6 Navigating the System 6.1 Introduction 6.2 Education pathways compared-the perspective on institutional arrangements 6.2.1 France 6.2.2 Sweden 6.2.3 Austria 6.3 Conclusion 7 Interactions between Individual-level and Institutional-level Factors 7.1 Introduction 7.2 What causes inequalities in education careers within systems?
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.