1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.1979.tb00032.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral Macro‐Orchidism in Otherwise Normal Men

Abstract: Six men with benign macro‐orchidism are described. There was no clinical evidence of endocrine or urologic disorder, and male sex characteristics were normal. Semen analysis data, previously unreported, and fertility of three of them indicate normal spermatogenesis. The findings suggest that some normal men may have unusually large testes. In these subjects, both seminiferous tubule and androgenic function were clinically normal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with bilateral megalotestis had markedly higher sperm concentrations and total sperm counts than controls. Also, percentages of progressively motile and morphologically intact spermatozoa were higher in group M. Similar findings were previously reported in a smaller study of 6 patients with bilateral macroorchidism (Padron et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Patients with bilateral megalotestis had markedly higher sperm concentrations and total sperm counts than controls. Also, percentages of progressively motile and morphologically intact spermatozoa were higher in group M. Similar findings were previously reported in a smaller study of 6 patients with bilateral macroorchidism (Padron et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%