2023
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02177-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral inguinal hernia repair by laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) vs. laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)

Nils Jimmy Hidalgo,
Salvador Guillaumes,
Irene Bachero
et al.

Abstract: Background The guidelines recommend laparoscopic repair for bilateral inguinal hernia. However, few studies compare the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) techniques in bilateral inguinal hernias. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of TEP and TAPP in bilateral inguinal hernia. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients operated on for bilateral inguinal hernia by TEP and TAPP repair from 2… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 59 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11 However, scrotal edema incidence was found to be as high as 33.3% amongst patients treated with bilateral TEP. In the study by Hidalgo et al 20 advanced age, large hernia defect, complete inguinal hernia and presence of dital indirect sac are reported as risk factors related with scrotal edema formation. The justification for difference of the results of the mentioned studies in terms of rates of scrotal edema formation could be because the epidemiological and clinical factors are not similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…11 However, scrotal edema incidence was found to be as high as 33.3% amongst patients treated with bilateral TEP. In the study by Hidalgo et al 20 advanced age, large hernia defect, complete inguinal hernia and presence of dital indirect sac are reported as risk factors related with scrotal edema formation. The justification for difference of the results of the mentioned studies in terms of rates of scrotal edema formation could be because the epidemiological and clinical factors are not similar.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%