2006
DOI: 10.1002/pd.1377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral fetal hyperechogenic kidneys associated with normal amniotic fluid: an ethical dilemma in a normal variant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prenatal diagnosis of echogenic kidneys comprises clinical dilemma regarding counseling of the future parents, especially in presence of a normal amniotic fluid amount and normal CMD, in which a normal renal function is usually expected in the neonate …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Prenatal diagnosis of echogenic kidneys comprises clinical dilemma regarding counseling of the future parents, especially in presence of a normal amniotic fluid amount and normal CMD, in which a normal renal function is usually expected in the neonate …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prenatal diagnosis of echogenic kidneys comprises clinical dilemma regarding counseling of the future parents, especially in presence of a normal amniotic fluid amount and normal CMD, in which a normal renal function is usually expected in the neonate. [12][13][14][15] Recently, Jones et al 12 reported two families presenting with prenatally detected hyperechogenic kidneys and postnatally diagnosed with 17q12 microdeletion syndrome. In their review, a diagnosis of 17q12 deletion with documented prenatal findings was reported in 25 cases (14 publications).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The prenatal counseling is challenging. Although most of time renal hyperechogenicity is indicative of renal parenchymal disease with possible impaired renal function after birth, in some cases, it represents a normal variant [Mashiach et al, 2005;Guerriero et al, 2006;Shuster et al, 2019]. Such abnormal echogenicity can be the early sign of multiple microscopic cysts, dysplasia, or tubular dilatation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%