2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bilateral femoral fractures: Does intramedullary nailing increase systemic complications and mortality rates?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is controversy regarding the effect of intramedullary nailing on postoperative pulmonary function, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications including ARDS, pulmonary dysfunction, fat emboli, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia have been estimated to be 4% to 38% among patients with femoral fractures in the presence of multiple injuries17). In particular, the incidence of postoperative ARDS has been reported as 2% to 15% after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femur fracture1819). For this reason, the use of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture is limited in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is controversy regarding the effect of intramedullary nailing on postoperative pulmonary function, the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications including ARDS, pulmonary dysfunction, fat emboli, pulmonary embolism, and pneumonia have been estimated to be 4% to 38% among patients with femoral fractures in the presence of multiple injuries17). In particular, the incidence of postoperative ARDS has been reported as 2% to 15% after intramedullary nailing for the treatment of femur fracture1819). For this reason, the use of intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric fracture is limited in such cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9, 13,23 Although 88% of the patients who underwent definitive stabilization of femoral fractures within 24 hours did not have complications, multiple organ failure could be mitigated in severely injured patients by incorporating damage control tactics to minimize systemic inflammation. 4,10,12,14,[24][25][26] This approach appears most important in patients who are insufficiently resuscitated. 13,24,[26][27][28] In addition, patients with associated unstable pelvic ring or spine fractures may be not be suitable candidates for early definitive fixa-tion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,7 Early definitive fixation of femoral shaft fractures can be associated with greater rates of complications and multiple organ failure in patients who are insufficiently resuscitated to tolerate definitive surgical procedures. [12][13][14][15] The potential for morbidity and mortality is even greater with bilateral femur fractures because more initial bleeding and longer surgical times are anticipated compared with unilateral injury. Some institutions have adopted protocols for patients who have fractures and multiple system trauma.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bilateral femoral shaft fractures are a rare but serious injury, with an incidence of 1%-7% and mortality rate of 6%-32%. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Optimal management for patients sustaining bilateral femoral shaft fractures has been an area of interest and controversy. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Initial standard of care for polytrauma patients involved definitive fixation of all orthopaedic injuries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%