“…Moreover, underweight (<5 kg) chicks that fledged from wild locations had a slightly higher probability of post‐fledging survival (0.28) than rehabilitated chicks (0.23). Emaciated seabird chicks are more likely to develop growth issues, including bony deformities (e.g., Buckle & Alley, 2011), and higher corticosterone levels (e.g., Kitaysky, Kitaiskaia, Piatt, & Wingfield, 2006) which might explain the lower survival probabilities for rehabilitated yellow‐eyed penguin chicks. However, given that the expected outcome for these emaciated chicks was starvation if no intervention had taken place, even a reduced post‐fledging survival is assumed to be of conservation benefit if this translates into recruitment, and if greater gains would not be achieved by expending resources elsewhere.…”