2008
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2007.070847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BILAG-2004 index captures systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity better than SLEDAI-2000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
41
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that, in clinical practice, it is difficult in most cases of lupus nephritis to evaluate disease activity using only the established criteria. 21,22 Doubt is particularly common because criteria such as hematuria and proteinuria may not always reflect the real presence and intensity of glomerular damage or even translate into renal disease activity. Here an additional urinary biomarker would be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that, in clinical practice, it is difficult in most cases of lupus nephritis to evaluate disease activity using only the established criteria. 21,22 Doubt is particularly common because criteria such as hematuria and proteinuria may not always reflect the real presence and intensity of glomerular damage or even translate into renal disease activity. Here an additional urinary biomarker would be useful.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skor SLEDAI juga sensitif terhadap perubahan aktivitas penyakit. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Pemantauan skor SLEDAI dapat dilakukan setiap 3-6 bulan atau ketika terdapat perubahan aktivitas penyakit. 1 Penelitian pada pasien LES dewasa yang dilakukan Ibanez dkk, 14 ) dan mengalami penurunan pada pengamatan bulan berikutnya.…”
unclassified
“…In a subsequent study, it was shown that the BILAG-2004 index captures disease activity better than SLEDAI-2000. 13 In conclusion, although the title of this editorial highlights the multiplicity of disease activity indices available for the assessment of lupus patients, it must be borne in mind that these tools are a considerable advance on what was available prior to the mid-1980s. Furthermore, in the last three years the updated versions of SLEDAI, SLEDAI-2000 and BILAG, BILAG-2004 are likely to become, by far, the most widely used indices, but how they perform in the ongoing clinical trials will be critical in determining their long-term usage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%