Bigger than Bitcoin: A Theoretical Typology and Research Agenda for Digital Currencies

Abstract

Currency is the fundamental economic technology that makes promises credible among actors within and across societies. From shells, to metals, to paper, the technology of money has continually evolved to meet the changing needs of human society. The twenty-first century is witnessing yet another evolution in the technology of money: digital currencies. Although political economy scholarship has begun to focus on digital currencies, this research has largely focused on single early examples like Bitcoin. I argue that this generally narrow focus has obscured important degrees of variation among digital currencies and, by extension, has omitted important lines of research on digital currencies as a familiar evolution in the technology of money. In this article, I revisit the history of digital currencies with explicit attention to not only economic inefficiencies but also political power structures and offer a new typology for theoretically organizing digital currencies along dimensions relevant to practitioners of political economy. I illustrate that variation along these typological dimensions produces important differences among different digital currencies and, relatedly, I explore the implications this has for digital currencies’ externalities and governance demands. Drawing on this typology, I conclude with a proposed research agenda for the political economy of digital currencies.

Possibilities of using the digital currency of the central bank in concessional lending to the agro-industrial complex

“…Наиболее актуальными направлениями исследований сегодня являются разработки оптимального дизайна ЦВЦБ и оценки влияния на него сетевых эффектов [15], выбора лучшей модели ЦВЦБ для отдельных стран [16], выявление возможных эффектов для денежно-кредитной и платежной системы [17], проработка правовых, управленческих и регулятивных перспектив эмиссии и оборота цифровых валют, вопросов кибербезопасности, роли ЦВЦБ в корпоративном и государственном управлении [18], выявление возможных рисков для потребителей, финансовой системы и монетарных властей [19] и др.…”

Sentiment Identification on Tweets to Forecast Cryptocurrency’s Volatility

“…Since the beginning of the internet, multiple discussions and debates are developed online by communities formed by members that share common interests, from old forums to modern's social media, those discussions have a strong potential to generate useful information. In the financial debates, one of the greatest issues debated is the possibility to create an autonomous and digital currency, native to the digital environment and maintained only by the users, having a structure safe enough to avoid fraud and thus gaining the trust of users (Marple, 2021). As a solution to this demand, the Bitcoin project (Nakamoto and Bitcoin, 2008) has been developed and generated all the crypto environment.…”

Into the ether or the state? Legibility theory and the cryptocurrency markets

“…In highly stylized terms, CeFi pulls markets towards legibility; DeFi pushes in the direction of illegibility. For rich discussions of these and other distinctions, see Marple (2021); Auer and Böhme (2020); Campbell-Verduyn (2018); Aramonte, Huang, and Schrimpf (2021). 32 Note, however, that market actors will likely develop informal rules amongst themselves.…”