2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2010.00581.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bigger Is Better: Market Size, Demand Elasticity, and Innovation*

Abstract: This article proposes a novel mechanism whereby larger markets increase competition and facilitate process innovation. Larger markets, in the sense of more people or more open trade, support a larger variety of goods, resulting in a more crowded product space. This raises the price elasticity of demand and lowers markups. Firms, therefore, become larger to break even. This facilitates process innovation, as larger firms can amortize R&D costs over more goods. We demonstrate this mechanism in a standard model o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 As goods '…ll up this circle', neighboring varieties become closer substitutes, implying a higher price elasticity of demand and a lower mark-up (Helpman andKrugman, 1985, Hummels andLugovskyy, 2005). As shown by Desmet and Parente (2010) in a static one-sector model, these preferences imply a positive e¤ect of market size on technological innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 As goods '…ll up this circle', neighboring varieties become closer substitutes, implying a higher price elasticity of demand and a lower mark-up (Helpman andKrugman, 1985, Hummels andLugovskyy, 2005). As shown by Desmet and Parente (2010) in a static one-sector model, these preferences imply a positive e¤ect of market size on technological innovation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, in as far as we match the size of …rms and the number of workers in the industrial sector, we are also matching what corresponds to the number of varieties in our model. 20 Whereas the intuition for the model's take-o¤ and limiting properties are clear, the transitional dynamics require some further discussion. The de…ning feature of the industrial revolution is the acceleration in the innovation rate.…”
Section: Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the persistence of the relative price,  is equal to the persistence of productivity, and the (conditional) volatility of  is increasing in  and    If   0 the persistence is given by ( +   )  (1 +   ) which is increasing in  but is independent of  The (conditional) volatility is increasing in  but is decreasing in . So, the Calvo 17 See Appendix B for the detailed model setup and solutions. 18 Here we drop the good index for notational convenience.…”
Section: Persistence and Volatility Of The Relative Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…And Smith strongly believed that the specialization -and so the division of labor -was one of the most important channels through which technological change occurred, thus joining many other scholars' view that the market size is a crucial determinant of innovation (see e.g. Sokoloff, 1988;North, 1990, Engerman and Sokoloff, 1997, Khan and Sokoloff, 2001, Sokoloff and khan, 1990Desmet and Parente, 2010. In addition to providing large markets for better and cheaper goods, the cities would also have contributed to developing different institutions such as the public services and the intellectual property rights (see e.g.…”
Section: D) Demand-side Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Galor and Weil, 2000), the market size (see e.g. Desmet and Parente, 2010), the stock of useful knowledge see (e.g. O'Rourke et al, 2013), or the evolution of individuals characteristics through natural selection (see e.g.…”
Section: The Causes Of the Industrial Revolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%