1965
DOI: 10.2307/2091388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big School, Small School: High School Size and Student Behavior.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barker and Gump examined school size and suggested that schools overloaded with students encourage less participation overall, while smaller schools encourage more participation. 10 A community with an adequate number of opportunities to participate in organized group settings, relative to the number of children in the community, may lead to different outcomes than a community with a fewer number of opportunities for participation relative to the number of children. At a smaller scale, episode time segments within a youth sport practice, for example, with optimal setting demand are associated with greater PA outcomes than episodes with disadvantaged setting demand (eg, elimination games, standing in line).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Barker and Gump examined school size and suggested that schools overloaded with students encourage less participation overall, while smaller schools encourage more participation. 10 A community with an adequate number of opportunities to participate in organized group settings, relative to the number of children in the community, may lead to different outcomes than a community with a fewer number of opportunities for participation relative to the number of children. At a smaller scale, episode time segments within a youth sport practice, for example, with optimal setting demand are associated with greater PA outcomes than episodes with disadvantaged setting demand (eg, elimination games, standing in line).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each organized group setting meeting is a dynamic social system with variability in group PA across meeting time. 1,[10][11][12] Total meeting time, defined by meeting start and stop point boundaries, can be time-segmented into smaller stable units, labeled sessions, based on naturally occurring changes in the social system, such as changes in task/purpose (eg, academic, PA) [13][14][15][16][17] ; location (eg, indoors, outdoors) 18,19 ; and member arrangement (eg, small group, whole group). 18 Sessions with a PA purpose can be further time-segmented into smaller units, labeled episodes, based on changes in task/purpose (eg, warm-up, skill drill); member arrangement; and setting demand (ie, whether exclusion or participation of all children in the setting is fostered).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emergent groups form spontaneously without time to build up resources in advance before deploying them (Shepherd & Williams, 2019). As primarily volunteer organizations, the energy required to act resourcefully with scale, scope, and speed cannot be sustained indefinitely (Barker & Gump, 1964;Oliver, 1984). As temporary ventures (Bakker et al, 2016), truncated efforts to rapidly develop new solutions may compress and damage the timelines and transitions of creative processes (Sonenshein, 2014).…”
Section: Resources In Crisis Entrepreneurshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human resource constraints surfaced as mostly uncompensated volunteers risked burnout from working long hours and taking on excessive responsibilities (Oliver, 1984). Although motivated by altruism and a sense of civic duty, the volunteer amateur labor pool was generally insufficient for the demand and poorly matched to the specialized circumstances (Barker & Gump, 1964). Moreover, despite extensive citizen learning, some expertise gaps proved too much to overcome.…”
Section: Period 2: Advancementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can range from class size to students being able to be a part of developing school policy. Specifically, the scholars have found many studies that agree that small class size gives rise to students' behavioral and emotional engagement level (Bell et al, 1965;Wehlage & Smith, 1992;Finn & Voelkl, 1993). In addition, Fredricks et al (2004) point out that students' behavioural disengagement can be averted due to schools being just and flexible in exercising their authority.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Student Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%