Next-Generation Analyst VI 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2306500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big open-source social science: capabilities and methodology for automating social science analytics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We then binned documents by month of publication; in practice, time bin size could be chosen based on the frequency of documents under investigation. For each n-gram, g, over m time units, we generated a relative usage trend of m values by calculating the proportion of observed n-grams in each time bin that are instances of g. We used the Big Open-Source Social Science (BOSSS) tool [9,10] to collect a corpus of 2,760 news articles from Google News discussing Malindi, a city on the Kenyan coast, published between January 2016 and September 2018. As a validation technique for our usage quantification, we identified particular events the corpus discusses that we expected to associate with use of certain n-grams and ultimately with PMESII-ASCOPE topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then binned documents by month of publication; in practice, time bin size could be chosen based on the frequency of documents under investigation. For each n-gram, g, over m time units, we generated a relative usage trend of m values by calculating the proportion of observed n-grams in each time bin that are instances of g. We used the Big Open-Source Social Science (BOSSS) tool [9,10] to collect a corpus of 2,760 news articles from Google News discussing Malindi, a city on the Kenyan coast, published between January 2016 and September 2018. As a validation technique for our usage quantification, we identified particular events the corpus discusses that we expected to associate with use of certain n-grams and ultimately with PMESII-ASCOPE topics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%