2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big-Five personality prospectively predicts Social Dominance Orientation and Right-Wing Authoritarianism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
57
1
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
14
57
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The two prior longitudinal studies have failed to detect cross-lagged effects of conscientiousness on RWA in undergraduates (Perry & Sibley, 2012;. Our results were consistent with these prior studies in failing to detect a significant cross-lagged effect.…”
Section: Overview Of Predicted Longitudinal Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The two prior longitudinal studies have failed to detect cross-lagged effects of conscientiousness on RWA in undergraduates (Perry & Sibley, 2012;. Our results were consistent with these prior studies in failing to detect a significant cross-lagged effect.…”
Section: Overview Of Predicted Longitudinal Effectssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The present study provided the first full longitudinal test of the causal relations between personality, social worldviews, and SDO and RWA proposed by the DPM over a one-year period. The study extended previous research in this area by testing a full cross-lagged model in a community sample (Sibley & Duckitt, 2010b;Perry & Sibley, 2012; see also Sidanius et al, in press). More importantly, the study capitalized on the onset of the global financial crisis in order to test processes hypothesized by the DPM at a time when they should have been readily apparent.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Right-Wing Authoritarianism was measured using a shortened eight-item version of Altemeyer's (1981) original scale, adapted by Perry and Sibley (2012): E.g. "The only way our country can get through the crisis ahead is to get back to our traditional values, put some tough leaders in power, and silence the troublemakers spreading bad ideas".…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental evidence demonstrates that inducing social threat increases RWA through increased dangerous worldview, but exerts less influence on SDO (e.g., Duckitt & Fisher, 2003). Longitudinal panel studies testing the different parts of the models are still relatively scarce, yet published longitudinal studies confirm effects of the hypothesised personality factors (Perry & Sibley, 2012), worldview beliefs (Sibley, Wilson, & Duckitt, 2007), and perceived threat in society (Onraet, Dhont, & Van Hiel, 2014;see Onraet, Van Hiel, Dhont, & Pattyn, 2013; for a meta-analysis) on socio-ideological attitudes.…”
Section: Ideological/intergroup Constructsmentioning
confidence: 99%