Big Data: Some Ethical Concerns for the Social Sciences

Abstract

While big data (BD) has been around for a while now, the social sciences have been comparatively cautious in its adoption for research purposes. This article briefly discusses the scope and variety of BD, and its research potential and ethical implications for the social sciences and sociology, which derive from these characteristics. For example, BD allows for the analysis of actual (online) behavior and the analysis of networks on a grand scale. The sheer volume and variety of data allow for the detection of rare patterns and behaviors that would otherwise go unnoticed. However, there are also a range of ethical issues of BD that need consideration. These entail, amongst others, the imperative for documentation and dissemination of methods, data, and results, the problems of anonymization and re-identification, and the questions surrounding the ability of stakeholders in big data research and institutionalized bodies to handle ethical issues. There are also grave risks involved in the (mis)use of BD, as it holds great value for companies, criminals, and state actors alike. The article concludes that BD holds great potential for the social sciences, but that there are still a range of practical and ethical issues that need addressing.

Ethical Considerations in Data Collection and Analysis: A Review: Investigating Ethical Practices and Challenges in Modern Data Collection and Analysis

“…This framework provides a comprehensive approach to addressing ethical issues in big data research, particularly those related to methodological biases, data availability, and individual and social harms. Weinhardt (2021) discusses the ethical concerns of big data in the social sciences, highlighting its research potential and the implications arising from its characteristics. The paper points out that while big data allows for the analysis of actual behavior and networks on a grand scale, it also raises ethical issues such as the need for documentation and dissemination of methods, data, and results, the challenges of anonymization and re-identification, and the ability of stakeholders to handle ethical issues.…”

Can the principle of the ‘right to be forgotten’ be applied to academic publishing? Probe from the perspective of personal rights, archival science, open science and post‐publication peer review

“…However, anonymization is a purely technical solution that constantly needs to be improved (Malle et al, 2016). The rapid growth of the number of open data sets on the Internet is a big problem for data anonymization, because it makes it possible to link different data sources, due to which the risk of re‐identification of persons increases significantly (Weinhardt, 2021). Of course, in accordance with the best practices of open science, researchers share their data under the terms of appropriate open licences, and other researchers must use these research data exclusively for research purposes (Gomez‐Diaz & Recio, 2020).…”

Era Kecerdasan Buatan dan Dampak terhadap Martabat Manusia dalam Kajian Etis

“…Bukan rahasia lagi bahwa perusahaan-perusahaan berkepentingan dengan (big) data. Namun perbincangan mengenai (big) data menyisakan tanya mengenai beragam permasalahan seperti: pelanggaran (data breaches), diskriminasi (Gillis, 2019), dan analisis yang keliru (Weinhardt, 2020). Masalah privasi saat ini dapat dilihat dari kemungkinan bahwa orang lain bisa lebih tahu banyak hal tentang diri saya ketimbang yang saya sendiri tahu tentang diriku.…”