2013
DOI: 10.1177/2043820613514323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big data, little history

Abstract: The paper makes the argument that what is forgotten in the celebration of big data is history. Big data is presented as if it were disconnected from the past, removed from issues or problems that went before. I argue in this short commentary that the past remains potent for big data and that proponents ignore it at their peril. Rather than being a brand new approach, big data brings a series of problematic assumptions and practices first criticised 40 years ago by opponents of geography’s quantitative revoluti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
9

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
55
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…boyd and Crawford's article, cited above, is one example. and various contributions to a special issue of First Monday on big data (such as Baym, 2013 andBoellstorff, 2013) provide further critique, highlighting the making and shaping of digital data through methods (see also Barnes, 2013 andGitelman andJackson, 2013).…”
Section: Digital Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…boyd and Crawford's article, cited above, is one example. and various contributions to a special issue of First Monday on big data (such as Baym, 2013 andBoellstorff, 2013) provide further critique, highlighting the making and shaping of digital data through methods (see also Barnes, 2013 andGitelman andJackson, 2013).…”
Section: Digital Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, Manovich (2011) highlights the differences between 'deep data' about a few cases and 'surface data' about a large number of cases. Much of the depth that is lacking from digital data could be argued to include issues of historical context and connections with past events, individualist and humanist accounts of the social, and an underpinning sense of moral knowledge (see Barnes 2013;Ruppert 2013).…”
Section: Digital Data and The Reductive Nature Of 'What Counts' As 'Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it illustrates several of the principles of ''critical data studies'' (boyd and Crawford 2012; Dalton and Thatcher 2014). Despite the push-back against Big Data as being less effectual than its grandiose claims (e.g., Anderson 2008), the forgetfulness of its own history (Barnes 2014), and the need to avoid reifying it, Big Data has nevertheless been part of two key questions that are explicitly evidenced by the intelligence community: reconceptualizations of privacy as geopolitical assemblage, and ''algorithmic security. ''…”
Section: Paradoxes Of Big Datamentioning
confidence: 99%