2017
DOI: 10.3390/rs10010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big Data Integration in Remote Sensing across a Distributed Metadata-Based Spatial Infrastructure

Abstract: Since Landsat-1 first started to deliver volumes of pixels in 1972, the volumes of archived data in remote sensing data centers have increased continuously. Due to various satellite orbit parameters and the specifications of different sensors, the storage formats, projections, spatial resolutions, and revisit periods of these archived data are vastly different. In addition, the remote sensing data received continuously by each data center arrives at a faster code rate; it is best to ingest and archive the newl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in order to obtain such valuable information, massive numbers of remote sensing images have to processed, a process which is similar to trying to extract gold from sand. (5) HeterogeneousDue to the great variety in satellite orbit parameters and the specifications of sensors, the storage formats, projections, spatial resolutions, and revisit periods of archived data also vary enormously, and these differences have resulted in great difficulties for data stewardship and management (Fan, Yan, Ma, & Wang, 2017).…”
Section: (4) Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order to obtain such valuable information, massive numbers of remote sensing images have to processed, a process which is similar to trying to extract gold from sand. (5) HeterogeneousDue to the great variety in satellite orbit parameters and the specifications of sensors, the storage formats, projections, spatial resolutions, and revisit periods of archived data also vary enormously, and these differences have resulted in great difficulties for data stewardship and management (Fan, Yan, Ma, & Wang, 2017).…”
Section: (4) Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of efficiency of EO data processing, Figure 5 shows that cloud computing provides some services for big Earth observation data (BEOD), including spatial data infrastructure (SDI), EO data resource, algorithm or model library, processing and computation, systems and applications [11,45,46]. For example, the parallel mosaic and interpretation algorithms based on cloud computing have advantages in efficiency [47,48]. The most straightforward pattern is to provide spatial data infrastructures, such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Aliyun, which have a large number of clusters, machines, and servers that can provide infrastructure level services for users on-demand.…”
Section: Cloud Computing For Beodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the full connected layer in the traditional CNN structure, convolutional layer with a 1×1 convolution kernel [18] is employed to reduce the number of training parameters. L 2 regularization and Dropout strategies [19] are utilized during training process in order to improve the generalization of the CNN network. L 2 regularization is able to minimize the cost function in the training stage by making the sum of the squares of the parameter small.…”
Section: Convolutional Neural Network For Ek Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%