2015
DOI: 10.1080/10919392.2015.1125187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big data in the policy cycle: Policy decision making in the digital era

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
171
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 232 publications
(199 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
171
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It may foster governance battlegrounds dotted by advocacy coalitions and instrument constituencies who clash on the basis of digital or non‐digital problem definitions, policy options, or instrumentation and implementation preferences (Howlett, Wellstead, and Craft ; Weible ; Voss and Simons ). We know already that in some cases digital information and communication technologies expedite or slow the very pace of decision‐making, altering the nature and place of advisory work as a component of the policymaking process (Höchtl, Parycek, and Schöllhammer ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may foster governance battlegrounds dotted by advocacy coalitions and instrument constituencies who clash on the basis of digital or non‐digital problem definitions, policy options, or instrumentation and implementation preferences (Howlett, Wellstead, and Craft ; Weible ; Voss and Simons ). We know already that in some cases digital information and communication technologies expedite or slow the very pace of decision‐making, altering the nature and place of advisory work as a component of the policymaking process (Höchtl, Parycek, and Schöllhammer ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on big data, more sophisticated climate change models have been developed to reduce the uncertainty surrounding decisions linked to mitigating and adapting to environmental changes (Larson, White, Gober, & Wutich, 2015). But the models also add information that might expose policy-makers to largely irrelevant information or contradictory aspects and result in prolonged decision-making processes (Höchtl et al, 2016;Trenberth, 2010). Beyond data-based information, there are further multiple forms of policy-relevant knowledge that is vital to understanding climate change issues, and thus several evidence bases need consideration (Davies, 2004;Head, 2008;Pawson, Boaz, Grayson, Long, & Barnes, 2003;Schorr, 2003).…”
Section: Data-based Policy-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent examples show that local governments struggle with the integration of data knowledge, because of their dependence on additional data from other government levels or departments and outside stakeholders. The discrepancies of how data are collected at different levels and the legal framework for private companies compiling and analysing city data pose some of these challenges (Höchtl, Parycek, & Schöllhammer, 2016;Letouzé & Jütting, 2014). So far, there is however limited research on the intended use of big data in urban governments for specific goals, such as carbon emission reduction and the actual implementation of a data-based structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, MENTA integrates personal attitudes with relevant background data. In addition, tracking social media can assist policymakers in understanding how people experience a certain policy and drive their decisions for more responsive and resilient policies [9]. What is now realized with MENTA should be available on a broader scale via HDC, and information obtained via social media should be fed into the HDC system.…”
Section: Hdc For Policy Empowermentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most governmental organizations are not prepared to apply big data analytics to their strategic benefit, that is, to optimize their way of working, to redefine their role or actions, to consider the disruptive nature of technological changes, and to investigate the topic at large and find benefits for policy development, definition, and evaluation [8]. For governmental actions, technology is still regarded as a complementary tool to the existing organizational and administrative practices, but it is hardly viewed as capable of triggering changes to the actual structures of decision-making processes [9]. An important reason for the slow process of big data adaption in healthcare lies in the nature of big data: many players, providers, and facilities are unable to share data, not even within one organization, due to concerns and regulations pertaining to privacy and data protection.…”
Section: Status Quomentioning
confidence: 99%