2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine &Amp; Biology Society (EMBC) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/embc46164.2021.9630267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Big Data-Driven Brain Parcellation from fMRI: Impact of Cohort Heterogeneity on Functional Connectivity Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly heterogeneous variability across MRI scanner manufacturers has implications for consortium research using multiple sites with different MRI scanners. To this point, multiple neuroimaging studies using several large datasets have noted the impact of demographic and scanner diversity across samples on brain-phenotype associations, and the importance of incorporating appropriate covariates in multivariate modeling thereof (Benkarim et al, 2022; Brooks et al, 2021; Greene et al, 2022; Miller et al, 2016). This work emphasizes the importance of theoretical justifications in covariate inclusion, instead of including covariates to conform with research norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly heterogeneous variability across MRI scanner manufacturers has implications for consortium research using multiple sites with different MRI scanners. To this point, multiple neuroimaging studies using several large datasets have noted the impact of demographic and scanner diversity across samples on brain-phenotype associations, and the importance of incorporating appropriate covariates in multivariate modeling thereof (Benkarim et al, 2022; Brooks et al, 2021; Greene et al, 2022; Miller et al, 2016). This work emphasizes the importance of theoretical justifications in covariate inclusion, instead of including covariates to conform with research norms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%