2006
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.74.036311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifurcation of droplet flows within capillaries

Abstract: Flows of droplets through networks of microchannels differ significantly from the flow of simple fluids. Our report focuses on the paths of individual droplets through the simplest possible network: a channel that splits into two arms that subsequently recombine. This simple system exhibits complex patterns of flow: both periodic and irregular, depending on the frequency at which the drops are fed into the "loop." A numerical model explains these results and shows regions of regular patterns separated by regio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
108
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Similarly in microchannels, the three-dimensional nature of the microfluidic network is often overlooked because bubble/droplet dynamics are generally visualized in a plane. [10][11][12] Rectangular channels are the norm, and the potential offered by more complex flow geometries has for the most part been neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Similarly in microchannels, the three-dimensional nature of the microfluidic network is often overlooked because bubble/droplet dynamics are generally visualized in a plane. [10][11][12] Rectangular channels are the norm, and the potential offered by more complex flow geometries has for the most part been neglected.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that real fluid is very complex, and various dynamical behaviors can be found in real fluid, including asymmetry, vortices, turbulence [22,23], bifurcation [24], and spatiotemporal chaos [25,26]. These phenomena are also components of glottal airflow [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This manner of forcing would cause the flow rate at a particular junction to be set by the resistance through the entire parallel arm, so that device feedback can have a pronounced effect, as seen by Barbier et al (2006), even when all components of the system are incompressible. In designing parallel devices for monodisperse foam and emulsion formation, care must be taken to mitigate the downstream effects of bubbles or droplets on flow, especially at channel junctions (see Engl et al 2005;Jousse et al 2006). Feedback, even in parallel systems, need not be simply a liability in the operation of microfluidic devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%