2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifurcation boundary analysis as a nonlinear damage detection feature: does it work?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the field of aeroelasticity, the nonlinearities may be originated from the unsteady aerodynamic flow, large structural deflections, material behavior, and partial loss of structural integrity (Dowell et al, 2003; Lee et al, 1999). Nonlinear responses can suffer from abrupt changes from damped motions to LCOs, which limits the operational regime of aircraft and may result in structural fatigue, or even to catastrophic failure (Dowell et al, 2003; Eftekhari et al, 2011; Lee et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the field of aeroelasticity, the nonlinearities may be originated from the unsteady aerodynamic flow, large structural deflections, material behavior, and partial loss of structural integrity (Dowell et al, 2003; Lee et al, 1999). Nonlinear responses can suffer from abrupt changes from damped motions to LCOs, which limits the operational regime of aircraft and may result in structural fatigue, or even to catastrophic failure (Dowell et al, 2003; Eftekhari et al, 2011; Lee et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eftekhari et. al [21] used four methods including Finite Difference, Finite Element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin approached to investigate the sensitivity of the bifurcation boundary for damage detection. Results of the finite element and RayleighRitz methods agree with each other and also show that the sensitivity of the bifurcation boundary to damage is much less than what previously reported when using a finite difference solution method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%