1975
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-197511000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifocal Control of Myopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…He also found, as our model predicts, that refractive changes are greater when a patient is myopic rather than hyperopic or emmetropic. Oakley and Young [12] report, similar to our results, a myopia progression rate of 0.3 to 0.7 diopters/year for fully corrected myopes ages 6 to 17. According to our model, under-correction of myopia should reduce the progression of myopia only slightly, since the eye is still substantially corrected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He also found, as our model predicts, that refractive changes are greater when a patient is myopic rather than hyperopic or emmetropic. Oakley and Young [12] report, similar to our results, a myopia progression rate of 0.3 to 0.7 diopters/year for fully corrected myopes ages 6 to 17. According to our model, under-correction of myopia should reduce the progression of myopia only slightly, since the eye is still substantially corrected.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…According to our model, under-correction of myopia should reduce the progression of myopia only slightly, since the eye is still substantially corrected. Reports of the effect of under-correction, for distance and near, are varied as the following reports exemplify [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. The conflicting results may be due to the small effect of under-correction and the difficulty of the experiment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] Clinical trials that evaluated the ability of these lenses to slow myopic progression provided varying results ranging from no success, 10,11 limited success 12,13 to clinically significant reduction of myopia. 14,15 Several studies have shown that myopic children with esophoria display greater benefit (i.e., reduced progression of myopia) from wearing near adds compared with children with exo or orthophoria. 13,16,17 In addition, accommodative responses seemed to influence myopia progression through the near add, with the greatest reduction of myopic progression observed in children with larger accommodative lags 13,16 and in esophoric children with higher lags of accommodation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of clinical trials and retrospective studies that have evaluated bifocal lenses are severely limited by small sample size, lack of a control group, lack of randomisation in the allocation of treatment groups or a combination of these deficiencies. [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Furthermore, bifocal lenses may be less cosmetically acceptable, are difficult to adapt to, and compliance with spectacle wear may be a problem. In addition, children may not always use the lower segment of the lens for reading.…”
Section: Bifocals and Multifocalsmentioning
confidence: 99%