2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bifacial scraper-knives in the Micoquian sites in the North-Western Caucasus: Typology, technology, and reduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the archaeological perspective, no technological breaks are documented in Micoquian 13,21 . However, Stajnia S5000 and Mezmaiskaya1, two oldest Neanderthal specimens associated with Micoquian, also have the smallest number of differences between their mtDNA genomes, and fall outside of the mtDNA variation observed in late Neanderthals found in Micoquian contexts (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the archaeological perspective, no technological breaks are documented in Micoquian 13,21 . However, Stajnia S5000 and Mezmaiskaya1, two oldest Neanderthal specimens associated with Micoquian, also have the smallest number of differences between their mtDNA genomes, and fall outside of the mtDNA variation observed in late Neanderthals found in Micoquian contexts (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After MIS 4, a second population turnover occurred in the Caucasus where the Neanderthal fossil of Mezmaiskaya 2 (MIS 3) shares significantly more derived alleles with other late western Neanderthals than with the local group of Mezmaiskaya 1 (MIS 4) 19 . However, this replacement was not followed by a technological break because the Micoquian techno-complex persisted in the region from late MIS 5 to the final Middle Palaeolithic 20 , 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A principal component analysis was performed on five attributes of each artifact, using the R package "vegan" (Oksanen et al 2016): (1) the length-width-index (LWI) or elongation, calculated from the maximum length divided by the maximum width, (2) the width of each tool relative to its thickness, expressing the flatness of the artifact (Bordes 1961; Debénath and Dibble 1994), (3 and 4) the minimum and maximum edge angle of the cutting edge measured with a goniometer up to a distance of 5 mm from the edge, and (5) the ratio of the retouched to non-retouched edge length to get a measure for the intensity and quantity of edge modifications for each piece. For the application of PCA on stone artifacts, see e.g., Weiss et al (2017), among others (e.g., Golovanova et al 2016;Scerri et al 2016).…”
Section: Attribute Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Greater Caucasus, at Mezmaiskaya Cave, Middle Palaeolithic (MP) industry is known by foliate and Micoquian artefacts [14][15][16]. This industry resembles the one recorded from Chagyrskaya Cave.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%