2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus of the awake freely behaving mouse

Abstract: There is significant interest in in vivo synaptic plasticity in mice due to the many relevant genetic mutants now available. Nevertheless, use of in vivo models remains limited. To date long-term potentiation (LTP) has been studied infrequently, and long-term depression (LTD) has not been characterized in the mouse in vivo. Herein we describe protocols and improved methodologies we developed to record hippocampal synaptic plasticity reliably from the dentate gyrus of the awake freely behaving mouse. Seven days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(67 reference statements)
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The current finding that persistent synaptic depression cannot be elicited in CA1 sub-region of the freely behaving mouse is somewhat in contrast to the robust LTD that can be induced in vivo in the dentate gyrus of freely moving mice (Koranda et al, 2008). Even more striking in this case is the fact that whilst application of the classical afferent low-frequency electrical stimulation of 900 pulses at 1 Hz produces stark synaptic depression in the dentate gyrus (Koranda et al, 2008), the same protocol fails completely to induce any observable change in synaptic response in the CA1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The current finding that persistent synaptic depression cannot be elicited in CA1 sub-region of the freely behaving mouse is somewhat in contrast to the robust LTD that can be induced in vivo in the dentate gyrus of freely moving mice (Koranda et al, 2008). Even more striking in this case is the fact that whilst application of the classical afferent low-frequency electrical stimulation of 900 pulses at 1 Hz produces stark synaptic depression in the dentate gyrus (Koranda et al, 2008), the same protocol fails completely to induce any observable change in synaptic response in the CA1.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…The current finding that persistent synaptic depression cannot be elicited in CA1 sub-region of the freely behaving mouse is somewhat in contrast to the robust LTD that can be induced in vivo in the dentate gyrus of freely moving mice (Koranda et al, 2008). Even more striking in this case is the fact that whilst application of the classical afferent low-frequency electrical stimulation of 900 pulses at 1 Hz produces stark synaptic depression in the dentate gyrus (Koranda et al, 2008), the same protocol fails completely to induce any observable change in synaptic response in the CA1. Although one of the obvious possibilities for the difference in the expression of LTD could be due to the region in question (i.e., CA1 vs. dentate gyrus), the more likely explanation is that in the intact hippocampus regulatory control restricts the range of afferent activities that lead to LTD, and in addition extrahippocampal neuromodulatory control may play an important part.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Of the low number of in vivo studies already performed in freely behaving mice, most were conducted on the hippocampal dentate gyrus Errington et al, 1997;Jones et al, 2001;Koranda et al, 2008;McGehee, 2009;Tang and Dani, 2009;Zhang et al, 2010), whereas fewer studies have been performed on other hippocampal subregions that are also critical in information processing. The limited in vivo mice studies conducted on the CA1 have shown an association between long-term potentiation (LTP) and associative learning (Gruart et al, 2006;Gruart and Delgado-Garcia, 2007;Madronal et al, 2007Madronal et al, , 2012, but have yet to comprehensively address the oft-overlooked opposite end of the synaptic bidirectionality spectrum (Bear, 1996;Martin et al, 2000;Malenka and Bear, 2004), comprising long-term depression (LTD), which is known to be essential for other forms of learning (Kulla et al, 1999;Manahan-Vaughan, 2004, 2008b, in press;Goh and Manahan-Vaughan, 2012;Hagena and Manahan-Vaughan, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many studies of LTP in awake rats have been performed 3,4 , very few have been conducted in awake mice primarily due to the technical complexity posed by the limited cranial real estate in mice and the weight of electrode headstages relative to the average weight of mice 5 . The few studies that have demonstrated LTP in DG in freely behaving mice utilized either microdrive electrode systems or junction field effect transistor (jFET) preamplifiers integrated in the headstage which necessarily adds to the electrode payload burden to the animal [6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%