1998
DOI: 10.1006/jecp.1998.2450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional Relations of Phonological Sensitivity and Prereading Abilities: Evidence from a Preschool Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

28
208
6
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(258 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
28
208
6
16
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather, reading is better conceptualized as a developmental phenomenon that builds on early print awareness, rudimentary phonological awareness, and vocabulary. These skills can be assessed reliably in children as young as 3 years of age, and are highly predictive of later decoding (Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Lonigan, Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 2007). If measures of print awareness replace measures of reading achievement, it should be possible to identify children whose print awareness is discrepant from their IQ prior to their entry in kindergarten or first grade.…”
Section: A "Wait To Fail" Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, reading is better conceptualized as a developmental phenomenon that builds on early print awareness, rudimentary phonological awareness, and vocabulary. These skills can be assessed reliably in children as young as 3 years of age, and are highly predictive of later decoding (Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Lonigan, Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 2007). If measures of print awareness replace measures of reading achievement, it should be possible to identify children whose print awareness is discrepant from their IQ prior to their entry in kindergarten or first grade.…”
Section: A "Wait To Fail" Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, children who have a rich language environment (through oral input or book reading) in preschool and at home are expected to develop vocabulary, which in turn stimulates growth in phonological representations (Metsala & Walley, 1998;Walley, Metsala, & Garlock, 2003). Indeed, studies with English-speaking children have shown that children with larger vocabularies tended to have more highly developed phonological awareness (Burgess & Lonigan 1998;Lonigan, Burgess, & Anthony, 2000;McBride-Chang, Wagner, & Chang, 1997;Metsala, 1999).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to print (through book reading) and letter names provides children with an opportunity to connect spoken language to printed words, promoting children's sensitivity to individual sounds. In particular, children's knowledge of letter names may be critical for the development of phoneme awareness (Bowey, 1994;Burgess, 2002;Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Foulin, 2005;Johnston, Anderson, & Holligan, 1996), and some suggested a reciprocal relationship between letter-name knowledge and phoneme awareness (Burgess & Lonigan, 1998;Foy & Mann, 2003).…”
Section: Background and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with DD are often unable to access the underlying sound structures of words, creating a difficulty in mapping sounds to written language (15)(16)(17)(18). Phonological processing skills have been found to be a key predictor of later reading ability in preschool and elementary schoolaged children (19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). In addition to phonological processing deficits, a range of other linguistic impairments have been observed in infants and prereading children who later exhibit weak reading scores, including speech perception (23,26), syntax production, and comprehension (32)(33)(34)(35), language comprehension (26), receptive vocabulary (22,34), and rapid automatized naming abilities (23,24,34,(36)(37)(38).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%