Proceedings of the 2019 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Systems 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3322645.3322687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional LSTM for Continuously Predicting QoE in HTTP Adaptive Streaming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of HAS video, the prediction models examine IFs that derive from end-user's traffic pattern characteristics [136] and incorporate both forward and backward dependence of the continuous QoE prediction [137]. The most accurate model however [138], is an end-to-end and unified predictive approach based on deep learning (DL) as a mix of CNN and LSTM that uses the MOS metric to assess QoE.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case of HAS video, the prediction models examine IFs that derive from end-user's traffic pattern characteristics [136] and incorporate both forward and backward dependence of the continuous QoE prediction [137]. The most accurate model however [138], is an end-to-end and unified predictive approach based on deep learning (DL) as a mix of CNN and LSTM that uses the MOS metric to assess QoE.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accurate model however [138], is an end-to-end and unified predictive approach based on deep learning (DL) as a mix of CNN and LSTM that uses the MOS metric to assess QoE. In [136], the predictive model utilizes three distinct component selection methods and six different classifiers, by employing SL techniques, whereas, in [137], the inputs from perceptual visual quality metrics, rebuffering, and temporal memory-related data are analyzed, with use of bidirectional LSTM (BLSTM). As we can observe in the Table XI, both the models that employ ANNs methods attain higher prediction accuracy than the model based on SL algorithms.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the overall QoE cannot be applied for real-time QoE monitor and also does not give sufficient information about events occurring during the session. Although the instantaneous QoE [6,7,30], on the other hand, can provide the instant perceived video quality at a certain moment, it only reflects locally the quality assessment within a specific time range, without considering the cumulative effects of prior events. Hence, it is highly sensitive to video impairments due to hysteresis effect [18,31] and does not precisely express the user's perceived video quality.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%