2020
DOI: 10.1002/ab.21891
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bidirectional associations between affective empathy and proactive and reactive aggression

Abstract: Preliminary evidence indicates that affective empathy is differentially related to proactive and reactive functions of aggression. However, additional longitudinal research is needed to understand the potential reciprocal nature of these links. The current study examined the bidirectional associations between affective empathy and proactive and reactive aggression over a 6‐month period during middle childhood, with attention to potential gender differences. Data were collected from 294 elementary school childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(149 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although it is widely accepted that the relationship between empathy and ASB is simply the converse of the empathy-prosocial behavior relationship (Gery et al, 2009;Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004;Lovett & Sheffield, 2007), some interesting derivations have been noted. In line with expectation, some research has noted that empathy is negatively related to aggression and disruptive behavior (Bons et al, 2013;Miller & Eisenberg, 1988;Tampke et al, 2020;van Langen et al, 2014), children and adolescents with CDs had significantly lower empathy than those in the control group (e.g., de Wied et al, 2005;Kostić et al, 2016), but others have not found evidence that those who act antisocially have lower empathy (e.g., Noten et al, 2020). The explanation of these apparent contradictory findings, concerning Geng et al ( 2012), "appears to be related to both the seriousness of the ASB and whether cognitive or affective empathy was assessed" (p. 501).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Although it is widely accepted that the relationship between empathy and ASB is simply the converse of the empathy-prosocial behavior relationship (Gery et al, 2009;Jolliffe & Farrington, 2004;Lovett & Sheffield, 2007), some interesting derivations have been noted. In line with expectation, some research has noted that empathy is negatively related to aggression and disruptive behavior (Bons et al, 2013;Miller & Eisenberg, 1988;Tampke et al, 2020;van Langen et al, 2014), children and adolescents with CDs had significantly lower empathy than those in the control group (e.g., de Wied et al, 2005;Kostić et al, 2016), but others have not found evidence that those who act antisocially have lower empathy (e.g., Noten et al, 2020). The explanation of these apparent contradictory findings, concerning Geng et al ( 2012), "appears to be related to both the seriousness of the ASB and whether cognitive or affective empathy was assessed" (p. 501).…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…, 2019 ). Previous studies have shown that empathy is negatively associated with aggression in childhood aged 8 to 12 years (middle childhood) and that this association remains stable through adolescence ( Lovett and Sheffield, 2007 ; Tampke et al. , 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empathy is a basic aspect of social-cognitive abilities and is related to prosocial behavior, aggression, and various indices of interpersonal functioning, such as the quality of peer relationships (Knafo et al, 2008;Lockwood, 2016;McMahon et al, 2006;Portt et al, 2020;Tampke et al, 2020). Studies on the relationship between BAP and empathy differ in terms of the assumptions regarding the dimensionality of empathy.…”
Section: Empathymentioning
confidence: 99%