2015
DOI: 10.3402/polar.v34.26372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biding time before breeding: flexible use of the Arctic landscape by migratory geese during spring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Only bean geese and greater white-fronted geese made short stopovers in a few wetlands along rivers within the taiga forest ecoregion. All staged in spring north of 60°N for periods of two weeks prior to arrival at ultimate breeding areas, providing breeding females with time to acquire fat and protein stores for reproductive investment prior to rapid follicular development before egg laying ( Anderson et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only bean geese and greater white-fronted geese made short stopovers in a few wetlands along rivers within the taiga forest ecoregion. All staged in spring north of 60°N for periods of two weeks prior to arrival at ultimate breeding areas, providing breeding females with time to acquire fat and protein stores for reproductive investment prior to rapid follicular development before egg laying ( Anderson et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, as intimated by Jefferies and Drent (2006), it appears that, in Svalbard at least, we are not dealing with a scenario similar to that found with lesser snow geese in the Canadian Arctic. Pink-footed geese respond to differing snow cover conditions through flexible use of the landscape; for example, by initiating nesting earlier when snow cover is low (Madsen et al 2007) or by remaining at pre-breeding sites when snow cover is high (Anderson, Hübner et al 2015). Therefore, future changes in spring snow conditions (extent of cover and melt-out rates) is likely to have a strong influence on where grubbing and its impacts on vegetation are felt most at the landscape scale (i.e.…”
Section: Pre-breeding Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Svalbard-breeding population overwinters along the northern coastline of the Low Countries of Europe, migrating through Norway to arrive in Svalbard in mid-May (Fox et al 2006). The arrival period to Svalbard is fixed to a one-week period in mid-May (Glahder et al 2006), after which geese then spend a short time at pre-breeding staging sites (Fox et al 2006;Glahder et al 2006;Anderson, Hübner et al 2015) before moving to their breeding grounds to initiate nesting when snowmelt allows access to their nest sites (Madsen et al 2007). Early in the season, prior to the availability of sufficient above-ground plant material, geese feed by grubbing for the nutritious below-ground rhizomes and storage organs of Arctic tundra plants (Fox et al 2006(Fox et al , 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in dry Arctic tundra habitats, goose disturbances can cause long‐lasting biomass reductions because vegetation growth and recovery are generally slow (Forbes et al, 2001; Jefferies et al, 2003; Speed et al, 2009; Van der Wal, 2006). Selective feeding for preferred vegetation (Speed et al, 2009) and variations in snow cover will therefore play a role in determining which parts of the tundra will be most exposed to goose disturbances (Anderson et al, 2015). Explicit documentation of snow cover impact on habitat selection and vegetation disturbance are yet limited (but see Anderson et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Svalbard breeding pink‐footed goose population has increased from c. 15,000 in the 1960s (Madsen, 1982) to c. 80,000 in 2015–2019 (Heldbjerg et al, 2021). They utilize pre‐breeding sites in Svalbard to feed until their breeding grounds are free from snow (Anderson et al, 2015; Duriez et al, 2009; Fox et al, 2006; Hübner et al, 2010). Upon arrival, geese prefer low‐lying moist and wet habitats, but extensive snow cover can prevent access to these areas (Anderson et al, 2016; Pedersen, Speed, et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%