2002
DOI: 10.3905/jfi.2002.319310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bid-Ask Spread, Volatility, and Volume in the Corporate Bond Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher the spread, the lower is the future price volatility. Hence, our results support the findings of Booth and Gurun (2008), Kalimipalli and Warga (2002), and Hasbrouck (1999). We also find that the average trade size, and not the number of trades, is the dominant determinant of the volume-volatility relationship which contradicts the findings of Jones et al (1994).…”
Section: Volatility and Traditional Liquidity Measuressupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The higher the spread, the lower is the future price volatility. Hence, our results support the findings of Booth and Gurun (2008), Kalimipalli and Warga (2002), and Hasbrouck (1999). We also find that the average trade size, and not the number of trades, is the dominant determinant of the volume-volatility relationship which contradicts the findings of Jones et al (1994).…”
Section: Volatility and Traditional Liquidity Measuressupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Recent empirical studies supporting this positive relationship include Hasbrouck (1999), Bollerslev and Melvin (1994) and Kalimipalli and Warga (2002), who show that this phenomenon exists in common stocks, foreign exchange rates and corporate bonds, respectively. Hasbrouck (1999) reaches his conclusion using a GARCH setup, while the other two studies use a two-step ordered probit analysis in which spreads are classified into distinct probability categories and GARCH models are applied to returns to provide an estimate of expected volatility.…”
Section: Empirical Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…This method is consistent with the so-called mixture of distributions hypothesis (MDH, see Kalimipalli and Warga, 2002), which considers new quotes as market responses to the arrival of new information. When there is no new information, there is no new quote.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 82%