2017
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicycle: a bioinformatics pipeline to analyze bisulfite sequencing data

Abstract: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since wg-blimp only integrates published software, and exhaustive evaluation of all conceivable pipeline setups would result in combinatorial explosion, we focus here on a feature-wise comparison of pipelines, similar to (19). We compared wg-blimp to BAT (20), bicycle (21), CpG_Me/DMRichR (10,(22)(23)(24), ENCODE-DCC's WGBS pipeline (25), Methy-Pipe (26), Nextflow methylseq (two available workflows) (27), PiGx (28) and snakePipes (19). Pipelines were compared with regards to technical setup (installation, workflow management), WGBS read processing (adapter trimming, alignment, methylation calling, quality control), and post-alignment analyses (DMR detection, segmentation, annotation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since wg-blimp only integrates published software, and exhaustive evaluation of all conceivable pipeline setups would result in combinatorial explosion, we focus here on a feature-wise comparison of pipelines, similar to (19). We compared wg-blimp to BAT (20), bicycle (21), CpG_Me/DMRichR (10,(22)(23)(24), ENCODE-DCC's WGBS pipeline (25), Methy-Pipe (26), Nextflow methylseq (two available workflows) (27), PiGx (28) and snakePipes (19). Pipelines were compared with regards to technical setup (installation, workflow management), WGBS read processing (adapter trimming, alignment, methylation calling, quality control), and post-alignment analyses (DMR detection, segmentation, annotation).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With ARPEGGIO, the aim was to consolidate performant tools into a common approach that could be used as a start for further investigation; in our case downstream analyses leading to a list of genes. Reproducibility was another main feature present in ARPEGGIO that was lacking in many workflows, but appeared to be more prevalent in more recent publications (71,(75)(76)(77). Enhancing and promoting reproducibility is essential to ensure that discoveries stand the test of time (78).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All workflows support diploid data, which is considered the same as polyploid data with an available polyploid phased assembly. When comparing the presence of quality check, alignment and statistical analyses, most workflows included them all together, but some didn't include either quality check (74)(75)(76) or statistical analyses (79). For methylation contexts, only two workflows focused on CpG context only (77,80), while all the other allowed analyses for all contexts (CpG, CHG and CHH).…”
Section: Comparison To Other Workflowsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of continuing drops 27 in sequencing costs, an increasing number of laboratories and international consortia (e.g. 28 IHEC, SYSCID, BLUEPRINT, EpiDiverse, NIH ROADMAP, Arabidopsis 1001 Epigenomes, 29 Genomes and physical Maps) are adopting WGBS as the method of choice to survey DNA 30 methylation in large population samples or in collections of cell lines and tissue types, either in 31 2/14 bulk or at the single-cell level [1,2]. Such surveys can easily generate hundreds or even thou- 32 sands of WGBS datasets in a single study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to help streamline the pre-processing 47 of WGBS data several pipelines have been published in recent years. These include nf-48 core/methylseq [29], gemBS [30], Bicycle [31] and Methylpy, some of which are currently 49 employed by several epigenetic consortia. gemBS, Bicycle and Methylpy integrate data pre-50 processing and analysis steps using their own custom trimming and/or alignment tools (see 51 Table 3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%