2014
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.m.00277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicruciate Substituting Design Does Not Improve Maximal Flexion in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This in contrast to stiffness rates with the original BCS I design of 22.6% [7], 2.7% [6], and 2.2% [4] reported in the literature. It remains unclear whether the absence of stiffness in our series was supported by the kinematic rotational alignment obtained using an extension-first surgical technique.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This in contrast to stiffness rates with the original BCS I design of 22.6% [7], 2.7% [6], and 2.2% [4] reported in the literature. It remains unclear whether the absence of stiffness in our series was supported by the kinematic rotational alignment obtained using an extension-first surgical technique.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Other authors have reported a high rate of early complications following implantation of the Journey BCS [4, 5, 7]. Of specific concern was a study reporting an increased risk of postoperative iliotibial band (ITB) friction syndrome (7.2%) with this device after a mean follow-up time of 2.5 years (range, 1 – 5 years), which eventually led to a surgical release of the ITB in 2% of these subjects [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…_ 1 0 ) T D $ F I G ] maximum flexion angle at post-operative 2years follow-up. 11 Mugnai et al reported a comparison of Journey. BCS and Nonrestrictive Geometry (NRG: posteriorstabilized knee system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies did not consider the impact of these factors when analyzing the correlation between PCO and ROM. In addition, the difference in the weight-bearing status can affect the flexion angle [ 15 17 ]. Even under the same weight-bearing status, active and passive ROM may also differ significantly [ 17 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the difference in the weight-bearing status can affect the flexion angle [ 15 17 ]. Even under the same weight-bearing status, active and passive ROM may also differ significantly [ 17 , 18 ]. Shi et al reported that an increase in the PTS can significantly increase the postoperative maximal knee flexion in PS TKA [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%