Birds N.Am. 2015
DOI: 10.2173/bna.592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this concern may be reduced at present because of a downturn in the pulp and paper industry and because the province has put measures in place to safeguard old growth forests (Government of Newfoundland and Labrador 2014), there is a need to assess the importance of old growth forests to these thrushes. Also, the ecology of Gray-cheeked Thrushes shows many similarities to that of the closely related Bicknell's Thrush, which was considered to be a third subspecies of Graycheeked Thrush until 1995 (Rimmer et al 2015). Bicknell's Thrushes make extensive use of young fir stands that regenerate after clearcutting or natural forest succession, with abundance peaking 11-13 years postdisturbance (Nixon et al 2001, Rimmer et al 2015, Chisholm and Leonard 2008, Aubry et al 2011; however, the use of dense, regenerating clearcuts by Gray-cheeked Thrushes has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although this concern may be reduced at present because of a downturn in the pulp and paper industry and because the province has put measures in place to safeguard old growth forests (Government of Newfoundland and Labrador 2014), there is a need to assess the importance of old growth forests to these thrushes. Also, the ecology of Gray-cheeked Thrushes shows many similarities to that of the closely related Bicknell's Thrush, which was considered to be a third subspecies of Graycheeked Thrush until 1995 (Rimmer et al 2015). Bicknell's Thrushes make extensive use of young fir stands that regenerate after clearcutting or natural forest succession, with abundance peaking 11-13 years postdisturbance (Nixon et al 2001, Rimmer et al 2015, Chisholm and Leonard 2008, Aubry et al 2011; however, the use of dense, regenerating clearcuts by Gray-cheeked Thrushes has not been studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the ecology of Gray-cheeked Thrushes shows many similarities to that of the closely related Bicknell's Thrush, which was considered to be a third subspecies of Graycheeked Thrush until 1995 (Rimmer et al 2015). Bicknell's Thrushes make extensive use of young fir stands that regenerate after clearcutting or natural forest succession, with abundance peaking 11-13 years postdisturbance (Nixon et al 2001, Rimmer et al 2015, Chisholm and Leonard 2008, Aubry et al 2011; however, the use of dense, regenerating clearcuts by Gray-cheeked Thrushes has not been studied. Consequently, there is a need for locally relevant information on the habitat requirements of Graycheeked Thrushes in Newfoundland, in particular their response to forest management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the Northern subspecies favors dense, low stature coniferous and deciduous thickets across its range (Todd 1963, Godfrey 1986, Kessel 1998, Lowther et al 2001, Marshall 2001, Gray-cheeked Thrushes on Newfoundland appear to make more limited use of deciduous thickets, and instead are characteristically associated with windswept coastal conifer thickets, conifer scrub, regenerating clearcuts dominated by young balsam fir (Abies balsamea), and high elevation, oldgrowth balsam fir forests (Lamberton 1976, Vassallo and Rice 1981, Thompson et al 1999, Marshall 2001. These latter elements suggest habitat affinities similar to those of Bicknell's Thrushes (Rimmer et al 2001). The island of Newfoundland, which falls within the Boreal Softwood Shield Bird Conservation Region (BCR8; Bird Studies Canada and NABCI 2014), is also the only extensive portion of the Graycheeked Thrush breeding range typified by southern boreal vegetation types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Marshall (2001) also noted the intermediate size and coloration of Gray-cheeked Thrushes breeding on Newfoundland and suggested that in the past they may have intergraded with Bicknell's Thrushes along the north shore of the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Following Ouellet (1993), Bicknell's Thrush was recognized as a separate species (Catharus bicknelli) based on morphology, vocalizations, and genetic differences (Monroe et al 1995, AOU 1998, Rimmer et al 2001, Dickinson and Christidis 2014. However, treatment of the Northern and Newfoundland Gray-cheeked Thrush groupings is not consistent, with some referring to them as distinct subspecies (e.g., Godfrey 1986, Ouellet 1996, Lowther et al 2001, Dickinson and Christidis 2014, and others interpreting the differences between these two groups as representing a cline within a single monotypic species (Wallace 1939, Marshall 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the species breeds in high-elevation on northeastern North America forest dominated by dense balsam fir (Abies balsamea) forest stands (Connolly et al 2002;Aubry et al 2011Aubry et al , 2016Townsend et al 2015), with generally ≥20 000 stems/ha. The combination of rough terrain and very high density of balsam fir stems adds to the aforementioned difficulties with the use of conventional, on-the-ground radio-tracking of Bicknell's Thrush.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%