2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Biceps femoris long head sarcomere and fascicle length adaptations after 3 weeks of eccentric exercise training

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of sarcomeres in series has been suggested to be an adaptive muscle mechanism in response to exercise-induced muscle damage (Proske and Morgan 2001 ). However, recent evidence suggests that increases in sarcomere length, rather than sarcomere number, may explain the increase in L f observed following 3 weeks’ eccentric resistance training (Pincheira et al 2021 ). Thus, as sarcomeres were not measured in the present study, further work is required to investigate the mechanisms underpinning the increases in VL L f elicited by short-term DR training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The addition of sarcomeres in series has been suggested to be an adaptive muscle mechanism in response to exercise-induced muscle damage (Proske and Morgan 2001 ). However, recent evidence suggests that increases in sarcomere length, rather than sarcomere number, may explain the increase in L f observed following 3 weeks’ eccentric resistance training (Pincheira et al 2021 ). Thus, as sarcomeres were not measured in the present study, further work is required to investigate the mechanisms underpinning the increases in VL L f elicited by short-term DR training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data are presented as mean ± SD MVT maximal voluntary torque, ACSA anatomical cross-sectional area, ML muscle length, PCSA physiological cross-sectional area in response to exercise-induced muscle damage(Proske and Morgan 2001). However, recent evidence suggests that increases in sarcomere length, rather than sarcomere number, may explain the increase in L f observed following 3 weeks' eccentric resistance training(Pincheira et al 2021). Thus, as sarcomeres were not measured in the present study, further work is required to investigate the mechanisms underpinning the increases in VL L f elicited by short-term DR training.Strength improvements observed after a period of resistance training are also partly underpinned by adaptations of the central nervous system (for recent reviewsHortobágyi et al 2021;Aagaard et al 2020;Siddique et al 2020;Pearcey et al 2021; Skarabot et al 2021).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, intraoperative measures of sarcomeres have been shown to be much longer in children with cerebral palsy (an injury of the brain during development) than sarcomere length estimates for Mathewson et al (2015) (∼88%) or intraoperative measures ( Lieber and Fridén, 2019 ) (∼46%) in typically developing children. In addition, following 3 weeks of Nordic hamstring training, a 17% increase in sarcomere length was found in the biceps femoris long head ( Pincheira et al, 2021 ). Due to the relative ease of obtaining fascicle length measures as compared to sarcomere length measures in vivo , many studies have reported adaptation of fascicle length to altered use or stimulus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparison, Franchi, Reeves, and Narici [46] highlighted that the underlying myogenic and molecular responses may be different in eccentric and concentric muscle actions because the eccentric training is considered to favour increases in fascicle length, and concentric training to favour higher increments of pennation angle [46]. A recent study by Pincheira et al [49] showed that eccentric training can increase fascicle length by increasing sarcomere lengths. Another study stated that concentric, eccentric and isometric exercises can lead to similar increases in total DNA and RNA quantities, which are representative of muscle hypertrophy; however, concentric and isometric training increases muscle insulin-like growth factor 1 mRNA levels, whereas eccentric training does not increase these levels [46].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%